Been a thing ever since they started allowing 12 subs or whatever it is now. It means if you want to make use of all your subs you have to make mass changes at least once, potentially disrupting the rhythm of your team. Pretty sure it’s designed to disadvantage clubs outside the Super League Six.
It’s a good thing some of them Saudi clubs have got loads of money to spunk on players too shite or old to play anywhere else. Imagine what they could do if anyone attended their games.
Presumably re-signing said player to a new contract that ends in five years and recalculating your amortisation expense would have the same effect without making him move house for ten seconds.
Surely it would be recognised as profit on disposals in the year the player registration was transferred? It wouldn’t be anything to do with the actual cash flow.
I don’t know. I feel like the rules have been there a long time and should discourage unsustainable practices and poor decision-making such as (entirely for example and definitely not based on anything real) spending money you haven’t earned yet on players who aren’t any good, or retaining a...
Love that old photo from the 1914 fixture. Bollocks to all this modern football watched by a pack of fannies with their electronic fags that smell vaguely of fruit and their stupid lengthy oiled beards and their scrolling through Tinder on their iPhones. Bring back pipes and flat caps and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.