"Life is an invaluable commodity and we should all cherish that."

[Mike - True Blue Tinter]

When Kelly was sacked we already had enough points to stay up, so why do people keep saying Kelly would have got us relegated?

Surely that was in hindsight. I thought when Kelly was sacked we could still be relegated. The teams below just failed to get the points so we would have been safe, but not theoretically at the time of the sacking.

 

[Jeff]

Surely that was in hindsight. I thought when Kelly was sacked we could still be relegated. The teams below just failed to get the poins so we would have been safe, but not theoretically at the time of the sacking.

Don't see the point you're trying to make

We didn't need any more points to stay up after he was sacked. At the time of the sacking we didn't know that (although at the time I suggested it).
But we know that now.

But people are still saying if he hadn't been sacked Kelly would have got us relegated. How do they think that could have happened?

 

[Matt_B]

Don't see the point you're trying to make

We didn't need any more points to stay up after he was sacked. At the time of the sacking we didn't know that (although at the time I suggested it).
But we know that now.

But people are still saying if he hadn't been sacked Kelly would have got us relegated. How do they think that could have happened?

Theoretically he could have attacked a linesman resulting in a 10 point deduction sending us down.

 

[Boy Genius]

Don't see the point you're trying to make

We didn't need any more points to stay up after he was sacked. At the time of the sacking we didn't know that (although at the time I suggested it).
But we know that now.

But people are still saying if he hadn't been sacked Kelly would have got us relegated. How do they think that could have happened?

he was pushing for administration, 10 point deduction down we go. I thought you knew that Jeff?.......:icon_roll