camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Not quite as bad as the stein men though.
New Contract Matty James
- Thread starter lcfcrules
- Start date
- Status
fitz
Well-Known Member
Take out the games he wasn't picked to play in and he hasn't missed a game for 5 years
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
11/08/17 - James starts first game for City in over 800 days
26/08/17 - James gets new FOUR YEAR contract
09/09/17 - James gets injured for "4-6 weeks"
It's now approaching 9 weeks and no sign of him. Was this new contract the single most stupid decision City have ever made?
26/08/17 - James gets new FOUR YEAR contract
09/09/17 - James gets injured for "4-6 weeks"
It's now approaching 9 weeks and no sign of him. Was this new contract the single most stupid decision City have ever made?
It was 22/9 when they said 4-6 weeks, 6 weeks from 22/9 was last Thursday. So maybe he's back training again.
Micky
Well-Known Member
This is perhaps a good example of Shakespeare's shortcomings. I am sure the Matty is a good lad but he should have been moved on and an upgrade brought in.
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
I am not sure Shakespeare has ever been in a position to recommend a new contract, never mind offer one.
Micky
Well-Known Member
If Shakespeare had told Rudkin that James was surplus to requirements, I doubt he would have got a new contract.
City Fan
Well-Known Member
The one for Ulloa was even more ridiculous in my opinion.
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
You surely haven't forgotten every player we signed between 2001 and 2006?
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Matt ****ing Mills
pork pie fox
Well-Known Member
We spunked some money away at that time.
City Fan
Well-Known Member
Seems like a drop in the ocean compared to the money we’ve spunked away in recent times.
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Of course not. But a rough and conservative guess of £50k a week over 4 years is over £10m. That's more than we probably spent net on everyone through those years.
jb5000
Well-Known Member
As a proportion of the club's income at the time though, we're probably not close to then
jb5000
Well-Known Member
Same thing that was happening when Vardy was being played on the wing
Ike O'Noclassed
Well-Known Member
I thought it was routine for PL clubs to offset the risk of a player having long term injuries through insurance, though the premiums for Matty could be eye-watering. Financially the hit that his injury-proneness would have on his transfer value would be big too.
Nothing compares to the club record fee we paid for Darren Eadie back in the day, makes the £1m we splashed out on James seem a positive bargain.
Nothing compares to the club record fee we paid for Darren Eadie back in the day, makes the £1m we splashed out on James seem a positive bargain.
I thought they'd stopped doing that years ago because it was too expensive.
big_mac4824
Well-Known Member
Talent for under 9's maybe
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Ipswich | 43 | 89 |
| 2 | Leicester | 42 | 88 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 43 | 87 |
| 4 | Southampton | 41 | 81 |
| 5 | West Brom | 43 | 72 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 43 | 71 |
| 7 | Hull City | 42 | 65 |
| 8 | Coventry City | 42 | 63 |
| 9 | Middlesbro | 43 | 63 |
| 10 | Preston | 42 | 63 |
| 11 | Cardiff City | 43 | 59 |
| 12 | Bristol City | 43 | 58 |
| 13 | Sunderland | 43 | 56 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 43 | 53 |
| 15 | Watford | 43 | 52 |
| 16 | Millwall | 43 | 50 |
| 17 | Blackburn | 43 | 49 |
| 18 | Plymouth | 43 | 48 |
| 19 | QPR | 43 | 47 |
| 20 | Stoke City | 43 | 47 |
| 21 | Birmingham | 43 | 45 |
| 22 | Huddersfield | 43 | 44 |
| 23 | Sheffield W | 43 | 44 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 43 | 23 |
