fitz
Well-Known Member
He's probably sat with Slimani bringing him all of yesteryear's news.
Mahrez
- Thread starter Cambridge_fox
- Start date
- Status
He's probably sat with Slimani bringing him all of yesteryear's news.
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
So our best player in these two games so far is the one that is leaving!
We truly are fecked if CS thinks that Gray can replace him at the moment.
Why the feck did we spend £30million+ on a striker who only appears to be able to use his feet for standing upright, rather than kicking the ball into the net?
We truly are fecked if CS thinks that Gray can replace him at the moment.
Why the feck did we spend £30million+ on a striker who only appears to be able to use his feet for standing upright, rather than kicking the ball into the net?
FOX Franks
Well-Known Member
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
Yes, but again with his head. Who is going to put in those particular type of crosses for him on a regular basis?
Mahrez, for maybe a few more weeks?
Albrighton, if he is on the appropriate wing?
Fuchs, with one of his excellent long throws, if he is picked?
It's the Sun FFS, what do you expect from a comic.
fitz
Well-Known Member
Tits?
City Fan
Well-Known Member
You don't think he gets a right to decide where he plays his football and brings up his children?
He already did he signed a five year contract.
City Fan
Well-Known Member
Exactly, he chose to come here. No one forced him to. He can turn down a move to Rome if he wants to.
City Fan
Well-Known Member
Yes obviously.
Skitzo
Well-Known Member
He has the choice, us or the team who bid what we ask
fitz
Well-Known Member
Shit loads of money and the potential to sit entire seasons out on the treatment table. Plus he's French.
FOX Franks
Well-Known Member
I do, absolutely, but he doesn't get the opportunity to make the decision as to whether the club accepts the initial offer. Which is what the excerpt actually says.
The thing that was posted is a copy of something the Sun said, not a quote from Mahrez. Nowhere in the article (here - https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/4077145/arsenal-transfer-news-riyad-mahrez-leicester/ ) does it contain a quote from Mahrez.
Nowhere in the article does it say what the source of this "information" is.
This is the same paper that a few days ago said Mahrez had agreed personal terms with Roma. Why would he do that if he only wants to go to Arsenal?
Typical tabloid nonsense.
Lots of tabloid and Internet rubbish at the moment. I wonder how much comes from Mahrez agent and how much is tabloid BS. I would imagine (hope) that whenever the price tag of 30-35 million is mentioned that is his agent desperately trying to bring his price down.
The market has gone insane. We should be demanding a minimum of 45 million.
The market has gone insane. We should be demanding a minimum of 45 million.
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Ipswich | 43 | 89 |
| 2 | Leicester | 42 | 88 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 43 | 87 |
| 4 | Southampton | 42 | 84 |
| 5 | West Brom | 43 | 72 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 43 | 71 |
| 7 | Hull City | 42 | 65 |
| 8 | Coventry City | 42 | 63 |
| 9 | Middlesbro | 43 | 63 |
| 10 | Preston | 43 | 63 |
| 11 | Cardiff City | 43 | 59 |
| 12 | Bristol City | 43 | 58 |
| 13 | Sunderland | 43 | 56 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 43 | 53 |
| 15 | Watford | 43 | 52 |
| 16 | Millwall | 43 | 50 |
| 17 | Blackburn | 43 | 49 |
| 18 | Plymouth | 43 | 48 |
| 19 | QPR | 43 | 47 |
| 20 | Stoke City | 43 | 47 |
| 21 | Birmingham | 43 | 45 |
| 22 | Huddersfield | 43 | 44 |
| 23 | Sheffield W | 43 | 44 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 43 | 23 |
