Graz
Well-Known Member
Was just about to post this as well, from the Mercury.
Not for me.... Imagine replacing Mahrez with Townsend!
Christ, maybe then the Mahrez haters would realise what we've got.
Speculation Motown's hysterical and annoying, but traditional, totally unfounded Summer 2017 rumours thread
- Thread starter FryattFox
- Start date
- Status
Was just about to post this as well, from the Mercury.
Not for me.... Imagine replacing Mahrez with Townsend!
Christ, maybe then the Mahrez haters would realise what we've got.
City Fan
Well-Known Member
Who would you suggest replacing him with?
fitz
Well-Known Member
Mahrez 2015/16
City Fan
Well-Known Member
That would be nice. Going back to the season where he didn't have five opposition players on him at one time.
Skitzo
Well-Known Member
its going up now then? All the more reason to drop Albrighton for Gray to exploit all that space
Robin127
Well-Known Member
Which one?
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Shall we all have a party when you make that exact same, lame comment for the 100th time?
Lako42
Well-Known Member
Okay, getting tedious now.
Nobody thinks he's shit, everybody would like to have an in form Mahrez in the team over most other options.
People aren't prepared to place any long term plans based on a player who doesn't want to be here, it's not hard, we don't hate him at all.
Now if people could stop getting hatred mixed up with not wanting or planning to have a player in the team who doesn't want to be on it, that would be excellent.
Maybe the scouts and manager should also pretend he doesn't want to leave so that we don't have any options lined up to replace him, that will be nice.
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
I've wondered on here about the respective roles of Macia and the old guard in terms of our recruitment this summer. All the signings have come in with comments about them being 'long term' targets that we've thoroughly scouted over a period of years. It's almost been as though Shakespeare was deliberately saying this. In effect, these are players from the 'Steve Walsh' era.
So what does Macia do? If he doesn't identify targets or negotiate deals (that's clearly been stated as part of Rudkin's role), what exactly is left?
This article adds to this for me. It would make sense that there are internal disputes between Macia and the old guard. Macia was recruited on the recommendation of Ranieri. Maybe he's recommending players that we're then putting to Shakespeare and the rest and they're not trusting him.
http://sportwitness.co.uk/internal-disputes-leicester-caused-transfer-25-year-old-defender-collapse/
So what does Macia do? If he doesn't identify targets or negotiate deals (that's clearly been stated as part of Rudkin's role), what exactly is left?
This article adds to this for me. It would make sense that there are internal disputes between Macia and the old guard. Macia was recruited on the recommendation of Ranieri. Maybe he's recommending players that we're then putting to Shakespeare and the rest and they're not trusting him.
http://sportwitness.co.uk/internal-disputes-leicester-caused-transfer-25-year-old-defender-collapse/
City Fan
Well-Known Member
Shall we all have a party for every time you wank yourself silly over him?
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Chelsea coming in with an increased bid for Drinkwater. £25m?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...-second-bid-danny-drinkwater-look-make-three/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...-second-bid-danny-drinkwater-look-make-three/
Lako42
Well-Known Member
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
Do we not want Barkley or Sigurdsson any more?
popillius
Well-Known Member
Clucas would be an excellent addition. I'd be happy with him and/or Barkley. Sigurdsson has been out of reach for some time now so we can forget him.
We'll end up with Jack ****ing Colback won't we....!
Lako42
Well-Known Member
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Tommy K mentioned that a few posts further up
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Ipswich | 43 | 89 |
| 2 | Leicester | 42 | 88 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 43 | 87 |
| 4 | Southampton | 42 | 84 |
| 5 | West Brom | 43 | 72 |
| 6 | Norwich City | 43 | 71 |
| 7 | Hull City | 42 | 65 |
| 8 | Coventry City | 42 | 63 |
| 9 | Middlesbro | 43 | 63 |
| 10 | Preston | 43 | 63 |
| 11 | Cardiff City | 43 | 59 |
| 12 | Bristol City | 43 | 58 |
| 13 | Sunderland | 43 | 56 |
| 14 | Swansea City | 43 | 53 |
| 15 | Watford | 43 | 52 |
| 16 | Millwall | 43 | 50 |
| 17 | Blackburn | 43 | 49 |
| 18 | Plymouth | 43 | 48 |
| 19 | QPR | 43 | 47 |
| 20 | Stoke City | 43 | 47 |
| 21 | Birmingham | 43 | 45 |
| 22 | Huddersfield | 43 | 44 |
| 23 | Sheffield W | 43 | 44 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 43 | 23 |
