The Mahrez Saga

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
**** 'em all - the longer they take the more the price should go up as it just makes it harder and less time for us to sign a replacement or two.

£80m minimum otherwise we are being completely ripped off!
 
£60m or £80m...ultimately it doesn’t matter as recent form shows we’ll spunk it on over priced dross from Russia and Portugal.
 
£60m or £80m...ultimately it doesn’t matter as recent form shows we’ll spunk it on over priced dross from Russia and Portugal.

I thought Pereira was a good deal, you must know something.
 
Plus Jonny Evans for 3.5 million, don't think we are spunking money.
 
****ing shitty Leicester spunking money on International players.
 
I thought Pereira was a good deal, you must know something.
I thought Silva, Slimani, Musa, Mendy etc were all good signings but what did I know.
 
He is irreplaceable.


I thought the same about Dougan.

The thing that keeps coming to my mind is that saying about true love and breaking up. “If you love something, let it go. If it comes back to you, its yours forever. If it doesn't, then it was never meant to be.” We've had what was meant to be with this bloke; it's time to let go and move on.
 
I can’t think of a single ‘sensible of mind’ Person who prefers a Leicester team without Mahrez.

He is irreplaceable.
Whatever!
We're not trying to get rid of him.
He wants to leave.
Big difference.

"Don't cry because I have gone, smile and remember all the good times"
Or words to that effect
 
After everything id still be well happy if he stayed. Just a little bit of me still thinks he might. Not because he wants to but because Man City wont pay what we want. From a fans perspective id happily watch him play for us for the next 2 years before he left on a free. Thats awful business though amd will never happen.
 
It is possible that if we did not accept a 'reasonable' offer from Mahrez he might just throw a wobbly and go anywhere to get his 'freedom to ply his trade' back.

I thought the delay was hinging on the size of agent's fees?

Serious question. In most areas of entertainment, theatre, music, tennis, golf etc, the agent takes a percentage of the fee/salary he negotiates for his client, often 10-15%. So if the client is earning £10million a year, the agent may keep £1million of it, which is why agents are keen to move their players to a new team with higher salaries.

Why in football is the agent's fee an addition to a transfer fee, rather than being taken by the agent from the client's package?
 
Should be wrapped up by now.

It's clear to me that Man City don't want Mahrez enough, they have shown nothing to make me think otherwise since they have been linked.

Mahrez needs to have a long hard think about this move.


Shambles
 
Should be wrapped up by now.

It's clear to me that Man City don't want Mahrez enough, they have shown nothing to make me think otherwise since they have been linked.

Mahrez needs to have a long hard think about this move.


Shambles
Yeah I agree. I think a lot of the rhetoric about a price being broadly agreed looks like the old Barca/Real trick of leaking stuff to the press from the Man City side (especially with the Spanish influence there). I wonder if they’re still a bit apart in terms of agreeing a fee?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leeds Utd3882
2Leicester3782
3Ipswich3881
4Southampton3673
5West Brom3866
6Norwich City3861
7Hull City3758
8Coventry City3757
9Preston 3756
10Middlesbro3854
11Cardiff City3853
12Sunderland3848
13Watford3848
14Bristol City3847
15Swansea City3846
16Millwall3843
17Blackburn 3842
18Plymouth 3841
19Stoke City3841
20QPR3840
21Birmingham3839
22Huddersfield3839
23Sheffield W3838
24Rotherham Utd3820

Latest posts

Top