1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Post Match Manchester City 5 Leicester 1

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by Jeff, Feb 10, 2018.

  1. LeeCovFox

    LeeCovFox Well-Known Member

    I’d not object to anybody who knows what they are talking about. Jamie Redknapp and Given may have played lots of top flight games but it clearly hasn’t given them any advantage in the punditry stakes as both are crap at it.

    I don’t disregard playing experience as being relevant so long as the pundit is articulate and does something other than state the obvious. Not very many ex-players tick those boxes. There are many who haven’t played who watch a lot of football and can talk fluently and informatively about the game.

    A player is useful insofar as they might be able to describe how a player thinks about or reacts to a given situation. Their perspective can be valuable. But playing experience in the Premier League shouldn’t be enough on its own to suggest that somebody like Houghton (who I didn’t watch, incidentally) has any less value in the studio.

    Jamie fucking Redknapp, for ****’s sake.
     
    tedfoxxx likes this.
  2. popillius

    popillius Well-Known Member

    Fucking hell, have I stumbled into The President's Club by accident?

    Holy Jebus.
     
    londonfox and Blue Maniac like this.
  3. City Fan

    City Fan Well-Known Member

    I refuse to believe that you can be that dense that you think your post is acceptable in this day and age.
     
    londonfox likes this.
  4. Jeff

    Jeff Administrator Staff Member

    It's about what they know, rather than who they are. If she can provide insightful analysis, then why not use her?
    Did she come across as clueless? If so, you might have a point.

    I switched off as soon as the final whistle went, I didn't want to have to see all the goals again.
     
  5. City Fan

    City Fan Well-Known Member

    At least BN’s total chauvinism has distracted us all from the shambles that was our performance tonight.
     
    bloo likes this.
  6. popillius

    popillius Well-Known Member

    I wish I'd have taken my own advice and napped through the bastard.
     
  7. homer

    homer Well-Known Member

    She needs it, in my humble opinion - surely we can all agree on that ?
     
    looney, City Fan and fitz like this.
  8. camberwell fox

    camberwell fox Well-Known Member

    Like our fucking team you mean?
     
    popillius likes this.
  9. looney

    looney Member

    Embarrassing . Appalling tactics from the off. Desire and commitment lacking, in fact I can't remember such an appalling lack of organisation and effort. And I'm soaking wet.
     
  10. camberwell fox

    camberwell fox Well-Known Member

    That’s disgusting. You can’t have a cripple on the panel without Glen Hoddle on there describing Karma, can you?
     
  11. Brown Nose

    Brown Nose Well-Known Member

    Thank you for at least addressing my point. All three of the panel were clueless and ill informed. She was no better or worse than the other two in that regard.

    Sky, BT and the BBC have never to my knowledge had a policy of selecting pundits on the basis of the quality of their insight. I assume that they are exclusively selected because of their ability to maintain or increase viewing figures and/or their availability.

    If Sky are trying to increase their female viewing figures and are doing this for that purpose, it may make some sense.
     
  12. Foxile

    Foxile Member

    * Quality on the pitch
     
    looney likes this.
  13. camberwell fox

    camberwell fox Well-Known Member

    You must have a brain injury as you’ve stayed here ten fucking years.
     
    popillius likes this.
  14. bloo

    bloo Active Member

    Oh I'm sure you can believe it. o_O

    Seriously though, why shouldn't she be there? Her opinion and perspective is different to that offered by former Premier League professionals. Not wrong, just different. Personally, I like that. I genuinely don't see it as tokenism. I see it as a positive thing. It shows that women can have a voice, it probably inspires some in that way. I don't have a problem with it in the slightest.
     
    Miles Away likes this.
  15. fitz

    fitz Well-Known Member

    Could say the same about Southgate
     
  16. Blue Maniac

    Blue Maniac Alzheimers sufferer

    Women’s football has different rules. Fewer balls for a start.
     
    SwedeFox and City Fan like this.
  17. Jeff

    Jeff Administrator Staff Member

    Why do you think that would increase female viewing figures?
    Surely they'd be watching it for the football.
     
  18. camberwell fox

    camberwell fox Well-Known Member

    Has your teacher ever stopped you going to the toilet?
     
    fitz and Blue Maniac like this.
  19. Rock Fox

    Rock Fox Active Member

    Pep and the rest of the viewing public must realise that our entire team (+ subs) is unlikely to meet the £80 million valuation on that performance. I thought at beginning of season we would finish 8th - have doubts about that now after the last 3 'performances'
     
  20. fitz

    fitz Well-Known Member

    Female football fans who haven't heard there's a male version of their game until she went on the box?
     
    Blue Maniac likes this.
Registered users don't see these ads.

Share This Page