1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Puel wanted by St Etienne

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by Jeff, May 13, 2018.

  1. Jeff

    Jeff Administrator Staff Member

    https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/...-news/leicester-city-boss-claude-puel-1562139

    Leicester City manager Claude Puel has been approached to take up 'a major role' at French side St. Etienne, according to reports.

    Puel has reportedly been sounded out by French-American businessman Jerome de Bontin, who hopes to complete a takeover of the Ligue 1 side.

    France Football journalist Nabil Djellit says de Bontin, the head of a pension fund who has previously held roles at Monaco and New York Red Bulls, has contacted both Puel and outgoing Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger for when his purchase of St Etienne goes through.
     
  2. Skitzo

    Skitzo Well-Known Member

    if this is true it would be a great face saving way out for everyone, owners can claim they wanted to keep him but he wanted to go home and he can claim the same
     
    Blue Maniac likes this.
  3. Blue Maniac

    Blue Maniac Alzheimers sufferer

    Yep, super convenient if real. Like when our prospective new owners didn’t really want NP to leave but hey Hull made an approach and that tactical genius Sousa was available...
     
  4. homer

    homer Well-Known Member

    He'll never hit those high notes on You're in a Bad Way

    Fair play to him for trying, though
     
    alex, Ike O'Noclassed, Macky and 5 others like this.
  5. TornadoShaunUK

    TornadoShaunUK Well-Known Member

    Yep, this way we can get rid without making ourselves look like a bunch of pillocks when he goes and does a good job in France, only to be turned away by Wenger, Benitez and co. and wind up with a recently sacked Sam Allardyce. Already I can't wait..
     
    Ike O'Noclassed and jb5000 like this.
  6. londonfox

    londonfox Well-Known Member

    There’s no face-saving needed. He should be sacked based on his horrendous record since taking charge.
     
  7. Skitzo

    Skitzo Well-Known Member

    horrendous record? we finished 9th and were 14th when he took over, you might have hoped for more, so did I, but 9th in the premier league, is the second highest finishing position we have ever had
     
  8. Jeff

    Jeff Administrator Staff Member

    We finished 8th in 2000. And a bit better than that in 2016.
     
  9. Skitzo

    Skitzo Well-Known Member

    yes I had missed the 8th finish, I just went back and checked, either way finishing 9th hardly happens with an horrendous record
     
    bocadillo likes this.
  10. David Gwilliam

    David Gwilliam Well-Known Member

    A very interesting and reasonable post. I want to see Puel out but I find it difficult to justify this. Fortunately in football I can let my heart rule my head. I was angry when Pearson was sacked, upset at the treatment of Ranieri, and sad at the sacking of Shakespeare - although it could be argued that the owners were correct in all three cases. I feel no emotional link to Puel.
     
  11. bocadillo

    bocadillo Water Gypsy

    If you think I'm going to fall for that one again...
     
  12. bocadillo

    bocadillo Water Gypsy

    Somebody reminded me.
     
  13. Skitzo

    Skitzo Well-Known Member

    no was just a simple error of memory on my part, unfortunately the way @Jeff has the forum set up I cannot edit my initial post
     
  14. SJN-Fox

    SJN-Fox Well-Known Member

    Quote from Puel ...

     
  15. londonfox

    londonfox Well-Known Member

    Yes.

    I don’t need to go in to great detail on the continual failure to beat relegation fodder at home, or the 10 goals conceded in back to back away games, or the bemusing team selections and substitutions. One win against the worst Arsenal team since Bruce Rioch playing with 10 men and a defeat against Tottenham does not change anything.
     
  16. Jeff

    Jeff Administrator Staff Member

    You can edit posts withing 6 minutes of making them. This is to allow people to correct mistakes.

    The reason you can't edit things after that time is to prevent people from changing history. So we can look back at things like predictions from the start of the season, and see how stupid we've all been.
     
  17. Miles Away

    Miles Away Well-Known Member

  18. Blue Maniac

    Blue Maniac Alzheimers sufferer

    And fifth in 1910, 7th in 1927, 3rd in 1928, 2nd in 1929, 8th in 1930, 6th in 1961, 4th in 1963, 7th in 1966, 8th in 1967, and 7th in 1976.

    This season is our joint-13th-best league finish.
     
    glyn likes this.
  19. Robin127

    Robin127 Well-Known Member


    But football didn't exist before 1992.
     
  20. Joe_Fox

    Joe_Fox Well-Known Member

    Yeah it did, it was just a better version of football. Apparently.
     

Share This Page