Ranieri

[Dour]

I thought I read somewhere that Kasper travels from Manchester each day.

Yes - Schmeichel lives in Alderley Edge and has a van that sometimes he drives, sometimes is driven for him while he has a kip in the back. I think the story was in the Mercury.

 

[FOX Franks]

Yes - Schmeichel lives in Alderley Edge and has a van that sometimes he drives, sometimes is driven for him while he has a kip in the back. I think the story was in the Mercury.

?

 

[fox58]

Hi there, I wrote an article on Leicester's title chances a couple of days ago. Check it out and check out the other articles on the website too. We're new and up-and-coming. \let me know what you think.

Do I smell spam

 

[bocadillo]

Do I smell spam

Fan power seems to have blown it away.

 

[Brown Nose]

http://www.football-italia.net/80566/azzurri-ranieri-mancini-after-conte

 

[Miles Away]

http://www.football-italia.net/80566/azzurri-ranieri-mancini-after-conte

Feared that. One of the only jobs he'd leave us for I suspect.

 

[Mawsley]

I call bullshit.

 

[Miles Away]

I think International management isn't his strength anyway. So I'm doubtful....but nervous.

 

[SJN-Fox]

Claudio's blog ...

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/claudio-ranieri-leicester-city-premier-league/

 

[Brown Nose]

http://www.football-italia.net/82417/ranieri-wins-bearzot-prize

 

[M17TT C]

Claudio's blog ...

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/claudio-ranieri-leicester-city-premier-league/

Couldn't help but smile all the way through reading that - Great find SJN!

 

[Cambridge_fox]

Great read!

 

[SJN-Fox]

But did you read it with Claudio's accent ?

 

[Cambridge_fox]

Of course! I even made his English slightly worse than what's printed.

 

[Robin127]

Claudio's blog ...

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/claudio-ranieri-leicester-city-premier-league/

Love this line when he talks about Kante, “One day, I’m going to see you cross the ball, and then finish the cross with a header yourself.”

 

[David Gwilliam]

Just read this in the comments section of The Guardian, made me chuckle:

"My name is Claudius Decimus Ranierius, Commander of the Armies of the Midlands, General of the Foxes Legions, loyal servant to the Thai emperor. Murdered by Chelsea, ridiculed by the media. And I will have my vengeance, in this life or the next."

The Romans have returned and he truly is Great Caesar.

 

[Sack]

Why does this not surprise me?

http://www.punditarena.com/football/dodriscoll/claudio-ranieri-probably-wont-win-manager-year/

 

[big_mac4824]

Why does this not surprise me?

http://www.punditarena.com/football/dodriscoll/claudio-ranieri-probably-wont-win-manager-year/

I genuinely don't think he cares, it is my impression this is really hurting the ex pros who have continually said we will falter! they are praying for Spurs to catch us especially Souness his face says it all on Sky.

It is brilliant to have a manager who does not blame other factors for bad results or bad decisions, the man is a class act!

 

[pork pie fox]

This is an entertaining thread:
http://www.redcafe.net/threads/claudio-ranieri.410839/

The best posts are clearly from "Amadeus", though. This being one of my favourite sections:
As I mentioned before, the holistic perspective takes into account the complete element of a team's performance, not the atomistic view that isolates importance statistic which evaluates how well a team has done this season. It is not holistic when you say, because Spurs is not on top of the table, we should ignore their performance. Holistically, Spurs has had more goals scored, a better defensive, a stronger creative output and better control of a game. As such this holistic perspective takes into consideration that Spurs team has been better this season than Leceister despite not being on top of the table.

 

[Cate Fox]

This is an entertaining thread:
http://www.redcafe.net/threads/claudio-ranieri.410839/

The best posts are clearly from "Amadeus", though. This being one of my favourite sections:
As I mentioned before, the holistic perspective takes into account the complete element of a team's performance, not the atomistic view that isolates importance statistic which evaluates how well a team has done this season. It is not holistic when you say, because Spurs is not on top of the table, we should ignore their performance. Holistically, Spurs has had more goals scored, a better defensive, a stronger creative output and better control of a game. As such this holistic perspective takes into consideration that Spurs team has been better this season than Leceister despite not being on top of the table.

Why cant any of these pillocks spell Leicester??