1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Should Dickov keep his place?

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by Scowcroft, Oct 20, 2003.

?

Should Dickov keep his place?

  1. Yes

    98.1%
  2. No

    1.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Scowcroft

    Scowcroft New Member

    SF recommended that someone should do a poll to survey whether Dickov should be in the team or not, and surprise, surprise, I have taken this on! :lol:

    I personally believe that Dickov should keep his place. IMO he has been excellent this season for us as explained in the other thread. I don't think we can afford to keep him out the team. When we played Fulham, we didn't create anything in front of goal because we didn't have the incisiveness of Dickov upfront pressurising the defence and winning free kicks. We were lacklustre and we conceded possesion far to easily because we didn't have an outlet in Dickov.
     
  2. Scarby

    Scarby Active Member

    Well done scowy. I have voted for Scowy to keep his place and my reasoning he kept us up last season, he makes chances, he can run, shoot and pass. But most of all he always ALWAYS puts 100% into his game.
     
  3. Taggarts right foot

    Taggarts right foot New Member

    Totally agree as I've always said it's the crosses and set pieces which are letting the stikers down.





    You may remember me frome such misspellings as Taggerts right foot :roll: :oops:
     
  4. londonfox

    londonfox Well-Known Member

    I believe we should give Bent and Jamie Scowcroft a go up front...

    And what's the shit with Dickov... Does he have it in his contract that he cannot play a full 90 mins... I know he works his nuts off and he must be knackered but why does Micky insist on ALWAYS taking him off... The decision to take him off on Sunday was a fcuking ridiculous...

    I thought our strikeforce had enough depth, but now i'm not so sure...

    Get Jamie off the wing and give him a go up front... and Bent is the most natural striker we have so why put him on the bench???
     
  5. Scowcroft

    Scowcroft New Member

    We should play Scowie behind the front 2:

    Code:
    Scowie
                     Dickov         Bent
     
  6. Scowcroft

    Scowcroft New Member

    You know what I mean, I just can't work this bloody code thing out! :evil:
     
  7. mad biker

    mad biker New Member

    Dickov MUST play, Dickon NOT Dickov :lol:
     
  8. Steven

    Steven Active Member

    He is our best player at the moment :?
     
  9. dave

    dave New Member

    He would be way more effective as a sub if Ferdinand becomes match fit him and bent would be 10 times more effective than dickov
     
  10. Ashov

    Ashov New Member

    Dickov = Work Horses
     
  11. gingerfox

    gingerfox New Member

    Dickov=LCFC Never say die :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
     
  12. Scowcroft

    Scowcroft New Member

    Looks like the majority want Dickov in the team. Not surprising really. I and many other fans would be mortified if we dropped Dickov as we would lose that drive and determination.
     
Registered users don't see these ads.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page