I dont feel the need to pit 2 city greats against each other at all.
both gave me great times as a city fan and i love em both the same for it.
God bless two real footballers of the leicester variety, weve had none since
Any news Bob?
Walsh - nobody has yet to even come close!!!
Elliott was a good player but cost £1.8m, Walshie cost £100,000. I know times changed but Walshie wore his heart on his sleeve and nobody ever gave more for the city cause.
Walsh - nobody has yet to even come close!!!
Elliott was a good player but cost £1.8m, Walshie cost £100,000. I know times changed but Walshie wore his heart on his sleeve and nobody ever gave more for the city cause.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Ipswich | 43 | 89 |
2 | Leicester | 42 | 88 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 43 | 87 |
4 | Southampton | 42 | 84 |
5 | West Brom | 43 | 72 |
6 | Norwich City | 43 | 71 |
7 | Hull City | 42 | 65 |
8 | Coventry City | 42 | 63 |
9 | Middlesbro | 43 | 63 |
10 | Preston | 43 | 63 |
11 | Cardiff City | 43 | 59 |
12 | Bristol City | 43 | 58 |
13 | Sunderland | 43 | 56 |
14 | Swansea City | 43 | 53 |
15 | Watford | 43 | 52 |
16 | Millwall | 43 | 50 |
17 | Blackburn | 43 | 49 |
18 | Plymouth | 43 | 48 |
19 | QPR | 43 | 47 |
20 | Stoke City | 43 | 47 |
21 | Birmingham | 43 | 45 |
22 | Huddersfield | 43 | 44 |
23 | Sheffield W | 43 | 44 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 43 | 23 |