Search results

I see you haven't lost any of that razor sharp wit. :roll:

Innit,

Cripplers? That's if you can get close to us. :wink:

It's an amazing team I tell you. Youth vs Cripples. Bring it.

You're right, during his last few seasons with us, he was neither a good defender or winger. As we changed from a 3-5-2 to a 4-4-2 he became a bit more exposed. He was decent at wing back because he didn't excel in any area, but had the energy to get up the right flank.

I wouldn't prefer to lose in any way. We were allowed to pass the ball because Rotherham sat deep at times, then hit us on the break with Campbell-Ryce, who was amazing today. If we didn't have Stewart playing today, it could have been a lot worse. We simply don't look like scoring at...

No, they're just players who can actually play football.

Keown was able to match Nathan Ellington for pace when we played Wigan away, although some of that was to do with his excellent positional sense. He is quicker than Dabizas, Elliott, Heath and Dublin. You're spot on, Cobbo.

You cheeky fecker. :wink: I'm fine thanks Lazzer, hope you're all well. :wink:

Quite ironic coming from you......

Thanks again to all those who voted, we received 12 votes this week. James Scowcroft was Leicester’s top man on the day with an impressive rating of 7.29. Nathan Blake continued to be a disaster and scored the lowest rating of 4.23. The 'Muzzy Izzet' Man of the Match award: James Scowcroft –...

Did anyone go yesterday? Let's have your player ratings please. Sheffield Fox is still getting his internet connection sorted, so I'm just collating them for him.

Click here to see the results

Yeah, they're excellent. :)

Thanks to the large petty Private Message you sent me. Then having the cheek to say you would delete any forthcoming reply. Now, who's being childish here? There was no need for you to get involved in the first place. Maybe if you didn't poke your nose in to situations that don't affect you...

I didn't. You did that.

That's quite funny. Maybe you should say things to my face instead of making sly remarks towards me and other's on public forums. Just a thought.

Sheffield Fox has asked me to obtain these as he won't get access to a PC for a few days. So please vote, let's try and get as many as possible. Pressman 6 Makin 5 Keown 7 Dabizas 6 Stewart 4 Scowcroft 5 Nalis 6 Williams 6 Wilcox 4 Dublin 4 Connolly 5 Subs: Gemmill 5...

You do know what I mean. No, you're not at that level, you're below it. MK, nice research. :wink:

Mat? Who's Mat? :? I'm not bothered what a little boy like you thinks. You're an embarrasment to yourself. How can anyone take you seriously? :shock:

Don't make assumptions without having any evidence to back it up. You don't like being called a little boy? Awwwww, poor you! :P

Where did I say that? Silly little boy.

Here we go again. If anyone is childish, it's you, I won't go in to any further detail, you know what I mean. MK, what poison comments are these?

Such a lovely person you are, Homer. Quite....

Whoopeeeeee

Oh dear......

Good work Sheffield. :)

:wink:

Shame you aint got the Prediction League that was on here last season. Never mind.

He got an almighty 2/10 in my player ratings. :wink: It's a ploy to decrease his tribunal fee, I tell thee! :wink:

Well, well, well - Marlon creeping back on here once the going get's tough.

I don't ever remember that being the case - He seemed to me to be challenging for every single ball. He held it up and flicked it on well for Connolly.

Wahey! Glad someone has a sense of humour. :wink:

Fukkin hell Lazzer, Scowcroft no commitment? He was injured FFS...... Have a word with yourself. :roll:

You, a good poster? :lol: You like to give the impression that you know what you're talking about, but in reality, you come across as clueless.

Oh my, we're actually getting somewhere then..... 1) Connolly and Dublin will prove to be excellent buys, Gudjonnson wasn't that bad, he requires some more match fitness before he shows his best. Last season - Howey was Ok, but was too much of a boozer apparently. Curtis and Hignett were seen...

No, because you're clearly clueless. How can you say some one has invalid points if you're not going to argue your case? Pathetic.

A) You contribute nothing except for disgraceful levels of English punctuation. B) Wasn't advertising, simply pointing out a post to another Leicester City forum, which I had contributed regarding player ratings. You wouldn't have this complaint if it was posted on Rivals, would you?

No. You're clearly not very good at putting your point across, but why does that not surprise me? :roll:

http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=907&view=findpost&p=13910