Tony Elsby
New Member
Personally I have always taken great pride in the achievements of the Tigers (and the County Cricket Club when they win anything) so a link-up with the oval ball is not instantly loathesome.
If this club is going to have ambition this seems a feasible way forward.
We are certainly competing with our hands tied at the moment and it shows.
If this way forward provides the chance of greater sporting independence then it will be a step forward. If it makes our going out of business less likely then it will also be beneficial.
Thirdly, if it will give us a 21st Century platform on which to launch a real challenge for national and European honours then why not?.
I am reminded of the rancour that existed between Hinckley Athletic and Hinckley Town fans before the merger into Hinckley United - a merger I believed in when manager of United back in the 70's.
Whatever reservations existed, the new Hinckley club has gone forward, is preparing to open its new facilities, has gone further in the FA Cup than it realistically might have hoped and is a far more respectable outfit than ever its previous dual entities were in modern times.
All I can see with the existing status quo at City is frustration and a future of diminishing gates due to underperforming on the pitch and little realistic chance of the finiancial picture improving dramatically.
People like Levein are far more likely to follow Martin O'Neil out of the door in frustration at having to shop with an empty wallet than they are likely to spend years developing players which are rapidly snatched up by the truly ambitious (a la Crewe).
I'm not for one minute saying this is a perfect solution or one that doesn't carry risks. Rugby itself is organised like a comedy circus.
Can you imagine what Ferguson would say if two thirds of his team were taken for chunks of the season for international duty without being able to postpone matches.
Championships are supposed to be won by the best team. Not the best team if the others aren't allowed to play their best men.
And, imagine Ferguson again if United won a title only to be told they had to play a one-off round robin against all and sundry to decide the real champions. What a load of nonsense and the reason I find it hard to take the Union set-up seriously.
But this is not the Tigers fault. They're probably more frustrated than most about the status quo because it has probably cost them the most.
In many ways Tigers lead the way forward, professionally, in rugby union so, overall, united development between the clubs seems a realistic way forward and possibly the only way of making a significant mark in football over the next couple of decades.
Change is rarely welcomed wholeheartedly (and often for good reason these days) but even if Levein gets us up in the next two seasons, what then?
Wherever will the money come from to compete at Premiership level that wasn't there for our last adventures into that illustrious territory?.
Like it or not Leicester City and Leicester Tigers represent major advertisements (probably the biggest advertisements) for our City and this will only lift the profile still further.
Let us wear our City badge as well as our club's badge with pride and let's hear it cheered and see it respected all over the world.
To me it's like a pioneering journey into space in search of a new planet. Full of dangers, full of problems to solve but, potentially, a journey to the higher echelons of a sporting world which we have never visited before and where, under the current set up, we are hardly likely to go in the future.
There is less likelihood of serious breakdown under the co-operative set-up than under the current one. So if our club and our prospects will be stronger for it then let's go ahead.
Light the blue touch paper and let's see where the journey takes us.
It sounds more exciting than the alternatives to me.
If this club is going to have ambition this seems a feasible way forward.
We are certainly competing with our hands tied at the moment and it shows.
If this way forward provides the chance of greater sporting independence then it will be a step forward. If it makes our going out of business less likely then it will also be beneficial.
Thirdly, if it will give us a 21st Century platform on which to launch a real challenge for national and European honours then why not?.
I am reminded of the rancour that existed between Hinckley Athletic and Hinckley Town fans before the merger into Hinckley United - a merger I believed in when manager of United back in the 70's.
Whatever reservations existed, the new Hinckley club has gone forward, is preparing to open its new facilities, has gone further in the FA Cup than it realistically might have hoped and is a far more respectable outfit than ever its previous dual entities were in modern times.
All I can see with the existing status quo at City is frustration and a future of diminishing gates due to underperforming on the pitch and little realistic chance of the finiancial picture improving dramatically.
People like Levein are far more likely to follow Martin O'Neil out of the door in frustration at having to shop with an empty wallet than they are likely to spend years developing players which are rapidly snatched up by the truly ambitious (a la Crewe).
I'm not for one minute saying this is a perfect solution or one that doesn't carry risks. Rugby itself is organised like a comedy circus.
Can you imagine what Ferguson would say if two thirds of his team were taken for chunks of the season for international duty without being able to postpone matches.
Championships are supposed to be won by the best team. Not the best team if the others aren't allowed to play their best men.
And, imagine Ferguson again if United won a title only to be told they had to play a one-off round robin against all and sundry to decide the real champions. What a load of nonsense and the reason I find it hard to take the Union set-up seriously.
But this is not the Tigers fault. They're probably more frustrated than most about the status quo because it has probably cost them the most.
In many ways Tigers lead the way forward, professionally, in rugby union so, overall, united development between the clubs seems a realistic way forward and possibly the only way of making a significant mark in football over the next couple of decades.
Change is rarely welcomed wholeheartedly (and often for good reason these days) but even if Levein gets us up in the next two seasons, what then?
Wherever will the money come from to compete at Premiership level that wasn't there for our last adventures into that illustrious territory?.
Like it or not Leicester City and Leicester Tigers represent major advertisements (probably the biggest advertisements) for our City and this will only lift the profile still further.
Let us wear our City badge as well as our club's badge with pride and let's hear it cheered and see it respected all over the world.
To me it's like a pioneering journey into space in search of a new planet. Full of dangers, full of problems to solve but, potentially, a journey to the higher echelons of a sporting world which we have never visited before and where, under the current set up, we are hardly likely to go in the future.
There is less likelihood of serious breakdown under the co-operative set-up than under the current one. So if our club and our prospects will be stronger for it then let's go ahead.
Light the blue touch paper and let's see where the journey takes us.
It sounds more exciting than the alternatives to me.