I'm not surprised after last week and the end to last season.No Chilwell
no it isn't, Fuchs starts
It might give us an extra defender though.Wow really surprised by the Fuchs for Chilwell change. Really surprised. That's going to give us even less width going forwards.
Fuchs can cross well slightly lacking in pace thoughWow really surprised by the Fuchs for Chilwell change. Really surprised. That's going to give us even less width going forwards.
when only Vardy gets in the box what's the point crossing it, other than just to make a few fans happy, its simply not an effective tactic for usFuchs is usually a better option going forward in my opinion as he's one of the best crossers we've got. Defensively he can't really be much worse than Chilwell was last week to be fair. He's was going forward, doing naff all and then not getting back leaving Soyuncu in a world of shit every time. Having said that, I am a bit surprised at the change, Chilwell is one of those who's better when he's got that space to run into - one bad game doesn't make a bad player and with it being against Chelsea you'd expect them to have a go and be in search of the three points and thus, leave more space for all our attacking plays. I also expected more from Wolves in that sense last week though..
At the away pub in Earl's Court. Excited for the drubbing!!!
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |