Foxes to be banned!

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scarby

Active Member
Hunt Supporters Launch Legal Challenge

The Countryside Alliance has launched a legal challenge to the ban on fox-hunting after it was forced into legislation despite the opposition of peers. Campaigners are questioning the legitimacy of the Parliament Act, which was used tom push through the law.A judicial review was launched today at the High Court on behalf of three applicants to try to overturn the ban.

They claim the Parliament Act passed in 1949, which replaced a previous Parliament Act of 1911, is illegitimate.

They are also expected to try to test loopholes in the hunt ban when it comes into force in February while others have pledged to disobey it.

A spokesman for the Countryside Alliance said the first hearing in the High Court was expected to be held in the new year and would centre on how the 1949 law was enacted.

The current version of the Parliament Act allows MPs to force through legislation against the will of the Lords if it has been rejected by peers over two sessions.

It replaced the original 1911 Act, which said laws could be forced through following three sessions of Parliament, the spokesman explained.

He said the Alliance would be arguing that the latter Act was illegitimate because it was forced through against Lords opposition using the previous one.

John Jackson, chairman of the Countryside Alliance, Mair Hughes, a farrier's wife from the Rhondda, and Patrick Martin, a member of the Bicester hunt, are expected to lodge the application.

The CA spokesman also said that the new Hunting Act did not comply with a number of aspects of the Human Rights Act as it did not compensate people who had entered into contracts who would lose out as a result of the ban.

He said 50,000 people were prepared to break this law as a matter of civil disobedience "in the full knowledge that they will be arrested, charged, and taken through the system".

"They are determined to do that to show the resolution of the rural community and to show how ridiculous this legislation is," he said.

"Many thousands of people will be going out and ringing the police station and saying 'come on, arrest me'."

He claimed there were many areas such as Exmoor, Dartmoor, parts of upland Wales, and Cumbria, where the ban would be "completely unenforceable".

"We won't encourage anyone to do it but we will understand why they have done it and we will support them after they have," he added.


Did i have you going!



nah didnt think so
 
we are not allowed to catch dolphins, but we do.
it is nice to eat something cleverer than you sometimes.
 
ScarboroughFox said:
Steven said:
MKFox said:
ScarboroughFox said:
Did i have you going!
you probably got steven going....

:roll:

I feel sorry for young Steven!

Since i have come back every thread has turned into a homosexual reference!
WHY?

Thank you for your concern Scarby. :wink: It is the "in joke" of the moment. It will move onto something else at some point. Either way it is a giggle unless someone takes it seriously. :wink:
 
Hugh Jarse said:
we are not allowed to catch dolphins, but we do.
it is nice to eat something cleverer than you sometimes.

Oooh, that's quite interesting actually. Maybe if the fox hunting tossers ate their 'catch' then it wouldn't be so macarbe. They should be made to eat the fox if they are going to kill it. yum yum, fox on toast.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top