Gemmil Signs New Deal

[drummindefender]

Personally i think this is a waste of time, what do you think?

 

[Bomber]

Personally i think this is a waste of time, what do you think?

Agreed, isn't this old news, did he not sign a new deal about a month back, neither here nor there as far as i'm concerned.[/quote]

 

[Graz]

Personally i think this is a waste of time, what do you think?

Agreed, isn't this old news, did he not sign a new deal about a month back, neither here nor there as far as i'm concerned.

[/quote]

He signed a deal for an extra month in October, and now Levein has given him another 3 months.


I thought Levein would get rid of him and use the money to get someone in on loan maybe.

 

[MKFox]

must be impressing him somehow....

 

[Durham Fox]

To be honest Gemill has always done OK IMO. He is a good passer of the ball and looks comfortable when he comes off the bench. I am suprised though that Leveins age policy didnt get the better of him.

 

[Scarby]

To be honest Gemill has always done OK IMO. He is a good passer of the ball and looks comfortable when he comes off the bench. I am suprised though that Leveins age policy didnt get the better of him.

I dont Gemill has done much wrong either.

Scott we add experience to the likes of Dawson

 

[leicester_til_i_die]

Gemmil not done much wrong, at the minute we haven't got a fighter in midfield apart from guddjonson, which we need, i can see why we've kept him, but he wont be here next season!

 

[Steven]

Personally i think this is a waste of time, what do you think?

Agreed, but I bow to CL in his wishes in this area.

 

[highland fox]

He's cover and at the moment we hardly have a big squad,still don't think he will get a long contract.

 

[Han]

Personally i think this is a waste of time, what do you think?

he's good back up. better than anything else we have to offer