Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Bet he's on a wedge and a half.
According to a 'well placed source' he's on £115,000 per week . . .
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/5292334/leicester-transfer-news-kelechi-iheanacho/
Bet he's on a wedge and a half.
That wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest.According to a 'well placed source' he's on £115,000 per week . . .
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/5292334/leicester-transfer-news-kelechi-iheanacho/
If true worst signing in history.
I hope we see the best of him at some point soon.
I think that given a run in the team he’d find his feet. Players don’t attract transfer fees and wages of that size at 20 for no reason. Problem is I don’t see him getting games because we don’t have that kind of squad management. Never have. The club has built an enormous squad and yet we still see similar squad usage to when O’Neill was managing the club; about half the starting lineup is guaranteed to start every week, so with a squad this size about half our senior players aren’t getting a look in at all. No wonder they’re pretty much feckin’ useless.
I hope we see the last of him at some point soon.
A perfect summary of our problems. Iheanacho not only attracted a large fee but Manchester City were very clear and very insistent on the clause allowing him to return. They must've seen something good in him. He needs to play games and regularly if he's to find his feet but I just don't see that happening here.I think that given a run in the team he’d find his feet. Players don’t attract transfer fees and wages of that size at 20 for no reason. Problem is I don’t see him getting games because we don’t have that kind of squad management. Never have. The club has built an enormous squad and yet we still see similar squad usage to when O’Neill was managing the club; about half the starting lineup is guaranteed to start every week, so with a squad this size about half our senior players aren’t getting a look in at all. No wonder they’re pretty much feckin’ useless.
Manchester City were very clear and very insistent on the clause allowing him to return.
Or both. That takes real precision.There's bluff. And then there's double-bluff.
Perhaps we've been bluffed or double-bluffed. I can't work out which.
Or both.
Are you sure or is that a bluff?Ya buggah!! I'd not thought of that possibility!
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |