Match Thread Leicester V Cardiff
- Thread starter Jeff
- Start date
- Status
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Two keepers again. Bit mad.
Kristiansen, Daka, Soumare, Castagne once again told to **** off. Clearly plans to name none of them in his squad.
Kristiansen, Daka, Soumare, Castagne once again told to **** off. Clearly plans to name none of them in his squad.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Oh, and where is Praet?
He's with Souttar.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Haha. Forgot him as well.
Hard to keep track of how many expensive footballers we have gathering dust.
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
EM already at BR levels of making a point via team selection.
Wonder if he's feeling worried/frustrated yet.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
He’s definitely making a point that those players have no future at the club. I sort of like it, but I recognize it’s all a bit extreme and chaotic.
We just really need these players gone. I know everyone keeps saying “you can’t get rid if no one wants them” but if there is absolutely no plan to use them, which is becoming apparent, we probably are better off just taking whatever deal we can get almost irrelevant of finances.
You can’t name two keepers on the bench every week without it impacting squad harmony. Also, there’s no getting those left out back onside. Praet, for example, must be spitting feathers.
popillius
Well-Known Member
Yep. It smells of a frustrated manager doesn't it. What a daft situation for us to find ourselves in.
londonfox
Well-Known Member
Doesn’t every manager make a point with every team selection?
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Praet may have a knock apparently. Would likely have taken Wards spot on the bench.
He’s very clearly told Daka, Soumare, Castagne, Iversen, Souttar and Kristiansen to stay away.
That’s around 100M in transfer fees sitting at home. Not sure I’ve ever seen anything quite like it.
He’s very clearly told Daka, Soumare, Castagne, Iversen, Souttar and Kristiansen to stay away.
That’s around 100M in transfer fees sitting at home. Not sure I’ve ever seen anything quite like it.
The Old Fox
Well-Known Member
It doesn't say much for our youngsters that there are two keepers on the bench: surely, it would be better to have a young player even if he isn't going to play...
TornadoShaunUK
Well-Known Member
More evidence of the stellar work done by Bodger Rodgers......
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
It’s a very clear, consistent and correct message, something you could never accuse that smarmy **** of.
At least we can all understand what he is trying to do and partially buy into it.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Doesn’t help Enzo further his point though, I suppose.
It’s hard to justify, but I’m trying.
londonfox
Well-Known Member
I’ve fully bought into it.
Love the message of dropping the players completely. Hopefully give a really strong indication that if you have the chance to leave and don't take it then you won't be playing.
But two keepers is a bit silly unless there are some practical reasons why putting a under21 on there doesn't work.
But two keepers is a bit silly unless there are some practical reasons why putting a under21 on there doesn't work.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Hopefully someone in the press corps ask him a very straightforward question.
Why do you keep putting two keepers on the bench?
Why do you keep putting two keepers on the bench?
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
| 2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
| 3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
| 4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
| 5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
| 6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
| 7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
| 8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
| 9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
| 10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
| 11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
| 12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
| 14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
| 15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
| 16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
| 17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
| 18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
| 19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
| 20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |
