Lets Get To The Bottom Of This

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Paul Ince may well turn out to be one of the game's great managers but at the moment he is unproven. I am fed up of 'up and coming' managers coming to Leicester and would personally prefer someone with a proven track record of;
1. Premiership/Championship experience
2. Bringing on young players.
3. Buying good players

Any new manager is a risk but I think we need to lessen that risk.
 
Paul Ince may well turn out to be one of the game's great managers but at the moment he is unproven. I am fed up of 'up and coming' managers coming to Leicester and would personally prefer someone with a proven track record of;
1. Premiership/Championship experience
2. Bringing on young players.
3. Buying good players

Any new manager is a risk but I think we need to lessen that risk.


The problem is, managers who have a GOOD record at this level and in the Premiership, are already with a big club, so we're unlikely to persuade one of them to come here.

The managers who are out of work are in that position because they failed, even if the failure is recent and they did a good job previously, that may not mean they can return to their previous success.

So really we have the choice of a failed manager, someone with no experience, or someone who has done well at a lower level.
 
Last edited:
If you don't want paul ince to be manager.......WHY? because i can't understand all the negativity

because im fed up of getting wank managers with no real experience who are touted as the 'next best thing' and then they take us as close to relegeation as weve been in our recent history.

m,aybe that helps you understand my reservation?
 
The problem is, managers who have a GOOD record at this level and in the Premiership, are already with a big club, so we're unlikely to persuade one of them to come here.

The managers who are out of work are in that position because they failed, even if the failure is recent and they did a good job previously, that may not mean they can return to their previous success.

So really we have the choice of a failed manager, someone with no experience, or someone who has done well at a lower level.

That would have been true previously. I am hoping that then lure of MM's money will bring in someone better than the tat we have had since MON.
 
That would have been true previously. I am hoping that then lure of MM's money will bring in someone better than the tat we have had since MON.

This is MM's history of appointments since he sacked Alan Ball at Portsmouth - hardly full of the big name experienced managers people seem to think he'll go for:

Bob McNabb 09-12-1999 13-01-2000
Tony Pulis 13-01-2000 12-10-2000
Steve Claridge 12-10-2000 25-02-2001
Graham Rix 25-02-2001 25-03-2002
Harry Redknapp 25-03-2002 24-11-2004
Velimir Zajec 24-11-2004 07-04-2005
Alain Perrin 07-04-2005 24-11-2005
Joe Jordan 24-11-2005 07-12-2005
Harry Redknapp 07-12-2005 Present
 
This is MM's history of appointments since he sacked Alan Ball at Portsmouth - hardly full of the big name experienced managers people seem to think he'll go for:

Bob McNabb 09-12-1999 13-01-2000
Tony Pulis 13-01-2000 12-10-2000
Steve Claridge 12-10-2000 25-02-2001
Graham Rix 25-02-2001 25-03-2002
Harry Redknapp 25-03-2002 24-11-2004
Velimir Zajec 24-11-2004 07-04-2005
Alain Perrin 07-04-2005 24-11-2005
Joe Jordan 24-11-2005 07-12-2005
Harry Redknapp 07-12-2005 Present
true jeff but i think were in a far better position then portsmouth were in terms of facilities and potential-plus Redknapp was still quite a scoop.
 
Wow, just what we need, another feckin Paul Ince thread, what was wrong with the old one?
 
The problem is, managers who have a GOOD record at this level and in the Premiership, are already with a big club, so we're unlikely to persuade one of them to come here.

The managers who are out of work are in that position because they failed, even if the failure is recent and they did a good job previously, that may not mean they can return to their previous success.

So really we have the choice of a failed manager, someone with no experience, or someone who has done well at a lower level.

So which does Ince comes under the someone with no experience, or someone who has done well at a lower level ? - probably somewhere between the 2

If MM was to go the someone who has done well at a lower level there have to be many better choices, even if you go for managing for a brief period that would surely put Grayson ahead of Ince?

Gary Johnson who has just got Bristol City promoted & previously did so well at Yeovil (who built on his foundations also made the League 1 play offs this year) would be on my list
 
Last edited:
I think this more than anything to do with Ince's antics on the field. Moaning cnut who swapped his alleigence more times than the next Chelsea.

'I love West Ham', 'I love Man Utd', 'I love Liverpool'

'I didnt get the Wolves job and it's because of race'

Apart from that, when you seriously look at the stats etc. Ince had an initial honeymoon and then struggled.
 
I think people don't want Ince because they just don't like him as a person,its nice to have a Manager you like.I'm not keen on Ince as a person but this isn't a popularity contest we are looking for someone who can get us into the Premier League and Ince might be able to do that,I do think he would attract some decent players.I wouldn't be too gutted if he got the job but would prefer Coleman much more
 
1 He's a ****
2 His side finished 90th in the football league
3 He's a complete ****
4 He has a chip on his shoulder the size of ten pounds of king edwards
5 He's a complete and utter ****
6 He is one of the most arrogant people I have ever met
7 He is a complete and utter feckin' total ****

Is that enough ?
 
1 He's a ****
2 His side finished 90th in the football league
3 He's a complete ****
4 He has a chip on his shoulder the size of ten pounds of king edwards
5 He's a complete and utter ****
6 He is one of the most arrogant people I have ever met
7 He is a complete and utter feckin' total ****

Is that enough ?

good enough for me
 
well im glad i created this thread as its helped me understand why people don't want ince to come here and is easier then trawling through tonnes of pages on the other thread
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226

Latest posts

Back
Top