One Year Kit ? Trust Members Survey Results

[Foxes_Trust]

Read the survey questions and the overall member’s response.

Then see what how the Trust is acting on members views

http://www.foxestrust.com/html/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=442

Part 2 of the results will appear around Tuesday lunchtime

 

[homer]

Please put this in an envelope and post it back to six weeks ago, when :

1. This was actually news
2. Before people had actually ordered the feckin' thing
3. When the local press, or anyone else, might have been interested in a fans representative group actually coming out and overtly condemning the club


Shambles

 

[EMC Fox]

I think it's good work... It's not too late for the club to change their mind and see sense is it? We have a whole season to get them to make it a 2 year kit.

Why does somebody always have to have a go at the FT? :roll:

 

[Joe_Fox]

The Financial Times?

 

[EMC Fox]

The Financial Times?

Is that a question?

 

[Joe_Fox]

The Financial Times?

Is that a question?

It is a question, the question being "Do you mean the Financial Times?"

Why does somebody always have to have a go at the FT? :roll:

 

[lazzer]

FT financial times/foxes trust geddit classic comedy genius from the foxster there :roll: :roll: :roll:

 

[EMC Fox]

The Financial Times?

Is that a question?

It is a question, the question being "Do you mean the Financial Times?"

Why does somebody always have to have a go at the FT? :roll:

Why would I be talking about the Financial Times? :roll:

 

[Yorkshire Vixen]

ignore joe EMC he can be an annoying little scrote at times

 

[EMC Fox]

ignore joe EMC he can be an annoying little scrote at times

at times? ;-)

 

[bocadillo]

Why does somebody always have to have a go at the FT? :roll:

I presume that was a rhetorical question.

 

[EMC Fox]

Why does somebody always have to have a go at the FT? :roll:

I presume that was a rhetorical question.

Was that a question Bob?

 

[bocadillo]

Was that a question Bob?

It was a statement. I was taught to suffix questions by the appropriate mark of punctuation.

 

[homer]

Get a room you two :roll:

 

[bocadillo]

Get a room you two :roll:

No need, Homer. I'm just off to the match.

I'm rather troubled however with your apparent unwillingness to witness a debate on the Foxes Trust. Perhaps you've already made up your mind - or are too busy with the other irrelevances of this board.

 

[Joe_Fox]

Irrelevances?! What irrelevances!

 

[EMC Fox]

I understand why the Trust come in for criticism in some cases. But in this case they have done a poll of their members and I hope they will lobby the club about it. If they had just gone straight to the club saying "The members aren't happy" The club would have been within it's rights to say "Where's your proof?"

So, they go out, get proof and still people complain :roll:

What other suggestions do you have to try to make a difference?

 

[EMC Fox]

Irrelevances?! What irrelevances!

:roll:

 

[homer]

I understand why the Trust come in for criticism in some cases. But in this case they have done a poll of their members and I hope they will lobby the club about it. If they had just gone straight to the club saying "The members aren't happy" The club would have been within it's rights to say "Where's your proof?"

So, they go out, get proof and still people complain :roll:

What other suggestions do you have to try to make a difference?

If they have to have a poll of all their members every time an issue comes up, then they might as well go and jump in the river

This item was newsworthy six weeks ago, and they should have come out and led opinion - not sit back and wait while they asked every single member what they think

Do they really need to ask every single numpty member whether it's a feckin' scandal that they publish a fan's charter one year,and receive all the plaudits for doing so, and then completely ignore it the next to blatantly rip off their long suffering supporters ? (and that is a rhetorical question, in case you were wondering)

 

[highland fox]

I understand why the Trust come in for criticism in some cases. But in this case they have done a poll of their members and I hope they will lobby the club about it. If they had just gone straight to the club saying "The members aren't happy" The club would have been within it's rights to say "Where's your proof?"

So, they go out, get proof and still people complain :roll:

What other suggestions do you have to try to make a difference?

If they have to have a poll of all their members every time an issue comes up, then they might as well go and jump in the river

This item was newsworthy six weeks ago, and they should have come out and led opinion - not sit back and wait while they asked every single member what they think

Do they really need to ask every single numpty member whether it's a feckin' scandal that they publish a fan's charter one year,and receive all the plaudits for doing so, and then completely ignore it the next to blatantly rip off their long suffering supporters ? (and that is a rhetorical question, in case you were wondering)

I might be wrong here homer but something gives me the impression that you aren't a great fan of The Foxes Trust...did they not help you out when you received that temporary ban for exposing yourself to that Crewe Alexandra fan ?