Steven said:If McLeish goes will CL be lined up to take over, or is this thought a load of horse hockey. :icon_roll :icon_conf
bocadillo said:I can't imagine that CL's thus-far experiences at Leicester enhance his chances of getting a 'bigger' job.
I reckon they will go for Burley to. Dont think they will go for another relatively unproven manager after their recent experience with Mr McLeish.Leigh said:Nah, sounds like rubbish to me, the name I've heard mentioned many times for the Rangers job is George Burley, which sounds far more likely.
fcukcov said:I reckon they will go for Burley to. Dont think they will go for another relatively unproven manager after their recent experience with Mr McLeish.
recent being this season of course foxfan. IMO it is more his team this year, he won the league with someone elses cast off team last year.Fox Fan said:Didnt they win the leauge last season?
Yeh it is pretty much common knowledge that they have been struggling for cash for a while. Maybe its time for them to link up with the english leagues?Fox Fan said:Thing is I think Rangers have some pretty big cash problems! So they may find it difficult to get a 'proven' manager due to the lack of funds.
We were discussing this in the pub the other night, and we all agreed that in theory it could work, but its the logistics of it. It wouldnt be exactly fair to the other clubs if they came in and went straight into the premier league. But the wouldnt do it if they had to start at the bottom.Fox Fan said:It gets me how theres plenty of Scots who want to be Indeopendent from the UK and hate the English - yet when it comes down to money they seem to have a different opinion.
I say leave the Scottish in Scotland and we can continue on as we are...we dont need Celtic or Rangers in our leagues at all. If they were to come in it would no doubt be at the expense of two english clubs somewhere along the line.
Plus its hardly fair on the traveling supporter if you have to go all the way to Glasgow to see your team play!
yep, newcastle and sunderland prove too much for most teams to go to. the memory will still be fresh in the rangers board's minds of what levein managed with hearts, but i think for them they need a huge name otherwise the fans may turn on the executives. rangers have no money but their chairman has one or two pounds knocking about which he throws in when he feels the need.Fox Fan said:Plus its hardly fair on the traveling supporter if you have to go all the way to Glasgow to see your team play!
i thought that was his 2nd title plus he has been there longer then 1 and a bit seasonsfcukcov said:recent being this season of course foxfan. IMO it is more his team this year, he won the league with someone elses cast off team last year.
Yorkshire Vixen said:myself and mr yv were talking about the managerial merry-go-round on the way home after satdis game i said at least no-one will want our manager because were shite
Steven said:If McLeish goes will CL be lined up to take over, or is this thought a load of horse hockey. :icon_roll :icon_conf
highland fox said:No chance of Levein going to Rangers when McCleish is booted out.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 20 | 47 |
2 | Arsenal | 21 | 43 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 21 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
7 | Aston Villa | 21 | 35 |
8 | Bournemouth | 21 | 34 |
9 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
10 | Fulham | 21 | 30 |
11 | Brentford | 21 | 28 |
12 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
13 | West Ham | 21 | 26 |
14 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
15 | Palace | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 21 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |