I don't know if anyone has heard this but i seem to recall hearing somewhere that QPR wanted to make a loan bid for Sir Les and if this is true then why don't we make a bid for him to get him on loan give him one more season at leicester where he did so well last season he's a genuine goalscorer that actually plays upfront which is what we're lacking and we all saw last season what a quality player he is so give him probably one last season and one that he can remember if he wants to come then we'll be almost certainly up next season.
Sir Les
- Thread starter Sam
- Start date
- Status
PFKAKTF FOX
Well-Known Member
Dont think he quite fits in with CL's ideal age range of 24-28 !
I have thought this one through and one season isn't goin to change any hopes of anything because we're probably not going to get promoted this season and if he gets a chance if he came then CL would be able to decide on that if he should play or not he's been scoring goals at Bolton this season and their doing well in the prem so that proves his ability still even at his age and to be quite honest our teams not moving much at the moment because we have old players like Pressman Dabizas Elliott Nalis Gillespie Tiatto Dublin all of these are outside of the 24-28 age of players CL wants i think they are anyway correct me if I'm wrong yet they're playing week in week out some of them so why shouldn't he come if Bolton would let him.
chrislcfc18
New Member
I read on another post that Muzzy tried to pursuade MA to let him stay on for 2 more years on lower wages but MA wanted to lower his wages even further.
If this is true then it looks like he would have loved to have stayed. Does anyone know if he is really happy at Brum. Would love to see him back here next year if we go up
If this is true then it looks like he would have loved to have stayed. Does anyone know if he is really happy at Brum. Would love to see him back here next year if we go up
drummindefender
Active Member
you seriously think izzet left because of ma? get real izzet left mainly for 3 reasons 1. his contract expired 2. we couldn't afford to keep him 3. premiership clubs showed solid interest and he wanted to play in the premier leaguestep said:
Muzzy was a city man through and through and I quote " The only reason most of us left city was because of ma"
Like the fans the players probably knew that they had the ability to get city straight back up. but they either knew ma was screwing up or simply did not like him or his methods, I dont claim to knew which. either way I am only quoting what was said.
Muzzy has been on a very good salary at city for a very long time and he has done very well out of city, he and others could have negotiated a contract with promotion clause, that increased their salary on return to the premier. One season on a lower rate would have not been a financial hardship to Muzzy or others that left city.
Like the fans the players probably knew that they had the ability to get city straight back up. but they either knew ma was screwing up or simply did not like him or his methods, I dont claim to knew which. either way I am only quoting what was said.
Muzzy has been on a very good salary at city for a very long time and he has done very well out of city, he and others could have negotiated a contract with promotion clause, that increased their salary on return to the premier. One season on a lower rate would have not been a financial hardship to Muzzy or others that left city.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
| 2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
| 3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
| 4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
| 5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
| 6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
| 7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
| 8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
| 9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
| 10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
| 11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
| 12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
| 14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
| 15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
| 16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
| 17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
| 18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
| 19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
| 20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |
