Sunderland (h)
- Thread starter 4-4-2
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Interesting that Oakley is in there ahead of Wellens.
Or should that be:
Interesting that Oakleypants is in there ahead of Wellybumbum.
Or should that be:
Interesting that Oakleypants is in there ahead of Wellybumbum.
Last edited:
Quite a strong indication there of a 4-4-2 approach for the start of the season... Interesting that they've gone with a trialist so close to the start of the season instead of adams or n**lson getting game time...
Pity we don't get to see Vitor.
Even more of a pity we have lost Pearson, Spearing, Waghorn, Vaughan and Nobby so have a much more threadbare, lower quality and slower squad!
That said - Campbell and Fryatt are exciting partnership up front so hopefully we can put in a good show
Pity we don't get to see Vitor.
Even more of a pity we have lost Pearson, Spearing, Waghorn, Vaughan and Nobby so have a much more threadbare, lower quality and slower squad!
That said - Campbell and Fryatt are exciting partnership up front so hopefully we can put in a good show
This could be the trialist....
Michael Lamey from Arminia Bielefeld.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Lamey
Michael Lamey from Arminia Bielefeld.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Lamey
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
lanxfox jnr
New Member
:icon_lol:I think that Paulo has seen Oakley adapt to the new style of play a bit better than Wellens
And two of them are called Logan :icon_conf
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
I would be a wee bit disappointed if Wellens doesn't start the season in the middle. But I think that's not far away from our side next satdee. Gallacher for Dany maybe, and the trialist will be doubtful (I guess).
Last edited:
:icon_roll
He's not even played for us yet...
Is there something in the waters that some City fans can't just WAIT AND SEE about a player before getting a downer on them?
I, honestly, can't give a flying shit what he's done since leaving PSV. If he's a more than able right back for us today then I'll be happy. Lets take it one step at a time....
Last edited:
Commentary here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/bbc_radio_leicester/
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
:icon_roll
He's not even played for us yet...
Is there something in the waters that some City fans can't just WAIT AND SEE about a player before getting a downer on them?
I, honestly, can't give a flying shit what he's done since leaving PSV. If he's a more than able right back for us today then I'll be happy. Lets take it one step at a time....
fitz
Well-Known Member
Played for two yo-yo teams in Germany, can't see how you can judge from that really
lanxfox jnr
New Member
Why is Schlupp not on the bench?! How can he not be on the bench?! :icon_cry:
Maybe he's changed his name to Logan.
lanxfox jnr
New Member
So there is a possibility of him to be on the bench?!
lazzer
Moderator
Macky
Gruntled Member
He was on the bench, but he Schlupped off
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
| 5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
| 6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
| 9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
| 10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
| 11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
| 12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
| 14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
| 15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
| 16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
| 17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |
