Vitor wants to stay
- Thread starter drummindefender
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
LCFCmonkey
New Member
I'd have him alongside A fully-fit Tunchev any day. Not mention of trying to do a deal to keep Naughton. Already done maybe???
:icon_conf
"Eriksson said he is trying to secure the services of all six of his current loan signings for next season's promotion push."
Blue Maniac
Alzheimers sufferer
That quote appears to imply we've only got six loan players.
Vitor doesn't count :icon_wink
drummindefender
Active Member
The article doesn't mention Naughton. Plus if QPR go up, I suspect they willl be in for him, and clearly a much more attractive proposition.
Out of all the loan players, Naughton is the one I'd like to see us sign the most, but I feel we have the least chance of doing so.
Out of all the loan players, Naughton is the one I'd like to see us sign the most, but I feel we have the least chance of doing so.
Ike O'Noclassed
Well-Known Member
Vitor looks nearest to the finished article for the job he's meant to do - defend. Naughton, bless his runs up field, spectacular strikes and somersaulting celebrations, doesn't. Hope Harry feels the same and sells or loans him back to us as a work in progress.
drummindefender
Active Member
I can't see Naughton being given a chance ahead of Kyle Walker
TornadoShaunUK
Well-Known Member
I agree with this.
city-faithful
Well-Known Member
Vitor has looked marvellous in the games he's been allowed to play in, there is a reason why Benfica rate him so highly. If he wants on board, let him. Obviously we'd have to meet scout Fahey's quoted release fee, but I don't see that as a problem.
tedfoxxx
Well-Known Member
He's been solid at right back too, could be the one to replace Naughty.
LoopisDeLupis
Well-Known Member
Ben Mee too. absolutely brilliant player, totally fearless going in for challenges
drummindefender
Active Member
I get the impression this is another loan not a permanent deal
Graz
Well-Known Member
I think that will be the case for a few of the younger ones to be honest.
Certainly the way Ben Mee spoke about coming back next year was about another loan. I think with Kyle Naughton, we're more likely to loan him again than buy him too. With the two Chelsea lads, I'm not sure they'd want to sell them either so might be looking at another loan deal.
I wouldn't mind a few of them coming back on loan again. After all, it would give us a more settled side than bringing in new loanees. But, I don't want us to loan all of them again and have the situation we do now where we can't even play them all.
I'd prefer if we weren't relying so heavily on loans next season. I don't think we will be.
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Why does Sven say, "the rules might change so we will only be allowed to have four in our 18-man squad", when we all know that Vitor doesn't count?
spionfox
Well-Known Member
Because the rules might change - change to include the likes of Vitor :icon_roll
bocadillo
Water Gypsy
So what's the relevance of 'four'? That would need the changing of two sets of rules and that is just not going to happen.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
| 4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
| 5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
| 6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
| 7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
| 8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
| 9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
| 10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
| 11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
| 12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
| 14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
| 15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
| 16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
| 17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |
