Walsall Player Ratings

[sheffield_fox]

If you went to tonight's 4-1 demolition job of Walsall, could you please leave your ratings at www.player-ratings.com/rate. Discuss below.

 

[enderby fox]

Martin 6

Gilbert 6
Hobbs 7
Morrison 7
Mattock 6

Oakley 7
King 6
Cleverly 8
Dyer 4

Howard 7
Fryatt 6

 

[drummindefender]

Martin 6
Gilbert 6
Hobbs 7
Morrison 6
Mattock 6

Oakley 7
King 7
Cleverly 8
Dyer 5

Howard 8
Fryatt 7

Dickov 4

 

[TommyK]

I wasn't there last night. but they both seem very harsh scores for what is being describes as the 'performance of the season' the the muckery.

 

[enderby fox]

I wasn't there last night. but they both seem very harsh scores for what is being describes as the 'performance of the season' the the muckery.

you should know by now that bill anderson watches a completly different game to everyone else.

if they hadn't taken their foot off the gas after 60 mins then they would be higher marks. we were good but they were shit too.

 

[Blue Maniac]

Apologies to sheff, I know you like to get people involved but I bombed a TalkTalk office a couple of months back so my internet's off :icon_bigg nobody was hurt though because it was the customer care call centre. I'm sort of back, but not really. Anyway, you've got my ratings now...

 

[sheffield_fox]

Don't forget you still have time to register your ratings at www.player-ratings.com/rate if you went to the Walsall game last night. Voting closes tomorrow evening.

Apologies to sheff, I know you like to get people involved but I bombed a TalkTalk office a couple of months back so my internet's off :icon_bigg nobody was hurt though because it was the customer care call centre. I'm sort of back, but not really. Anyway, you've got my ratings now...

Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[beaumontfox]

Martin 6

Gilbert 6
Hobbs 6
Morrison 7
Mattock 6

Oakley 7
King 7
Cleverly 7 MOTM
Dyer 5

Howard 7
Fryatt 6


Gave all three subs a 5, as tbh the work was done and the team were just coasting along by then.

 

[City Fan]

Martin 6

Gilbert 6
Hobbs 6
Morrison 7
Mattock 6

Oakley 7
King 7
Cleverly 7 MOTM
Dyer 5

Howard 7
Fryatt 6


Gave all three subs a 5, as tbh the work was done and the team were just coasting along by then.

The MOTM for a 4-1 win, who also scores a goal from midfield, gets a 7?

What would they have to do to get an 8? Cure cancer?

 

[Melton Fox]

The MOTM for a 4-1 win, who also scores a goal from midfield, gets a 7?

What would they have to do to get an 8? Cure cancer?

Win 5-1 and score 2?

 

[City Fan]

Win 51 and score 20?

That's more like it. :icon_wink

 

[beaumontfox]

The MOTM for a 4-1 win, who also scores a goal from midfield, gets a 7?

What would they have to do to get an 8? Cure cancer?

Because they didn't get out of second gear all game, and anyone who was there could tell you that scoreline for us could've and should've been at least 6.

Walsall were shite, and they didn't have to get out of second gear to beat them. Now if we get a similar scoreline on satdee at least a couple of those 7s would almost certainly change to an 8.

 

[City Fan]

Because they didn't get out of second gear all game, and anyone who was there could tell you that scoreline for us could've and should've been at least 6.

Typical woman - never satisfied. :icon_wink

 

[Melton Fox]

Typical woman - never satisfied. :icon_wink

I think that says more about you, TBH.

 

[City Fan]

I think that says more about you, TBH.

Was waiting for a comment along those lines, how did I know you would get there first?

 

[Melton Fox]

how did I know you would get there first? 102:

How do we know you did? I have only your word that you knew my reply was coming. And let's face it, you can't even handle a basic telephone conversation without crumbling so I have no reason to suspect that you also possess the skills to successfully pass off as a clairvoyant.

 

[City Fan]

How do we know you did? I have only your word that you knew my reply was coming. And let's face it, you can't even handle a basic telephone conversation without crumbling so I have no reason to suspect that you also possess the skills to successfully pass off as a clairvoyant.

:icon_lol:

 

[DesertFox]

Gave all three subs a 5, as tbh the work was done and the team were just coasting along by then.

Seeing as it's "have a go at Beaumont's scoring Day".... :icon_wink

Presumably what you meant to say was you gave the subs five each because that's what their individual performances merited, regarldess of what the team had done?

Otherwise you might just as well give a team score out of ten and have done with it.

 

[beaumontfox]

Summat like that yes.:icon_razz

 

[Hammond Organ]

The MOTM for a 4-1 win, who also scores a goal from midfield, gets a 7?

What would they have to do to get an 8? Cure cancer?

No way near an 8 for that. More like a 5. If they spent less time dicking around with petri dishes, test tubes and volunteer patients and more time concentrating on their football they might score more. All well and good for the Human Race, but does it benefit Leicester City on the pitch, no.