Are we at war? EDL reckon we are.

[Motown Fox]

EDL making the most of the horrific actions this afternoon of some lunatics.

R.I.P. to the poor guy who was murdered it's him and his family who are in my thoughts, not going out and getting revenge which EDL almost seem to be suggesting.

EnglishDefenceLeague ‏@Official_EDL 39m
ANY EDL MEMBERS TAKE TO THE STREETS IN YOUR LOCAL TOWN/CITY TAKE A STAND !!!!!

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/05/breaking-soldier-killed-in-woolwich-london/

EDL again

KEEP SHARING OUR PAGE WE HAVE NOW PASSED THE 50,000 MARK, ONCE AGAIN KEEP SHARING...NO SURRENDER

we are over fifty thousand likes! Please spread the word get as many people to like as possible then get active next few days, Please understand we are receiving hundreds of messages but we are going through them, lets build this Street army up! NS

Mosque attacked
No doubt the EDL will be rubbing their hands hearing this news as some idiot takes their words into action


It gets worse http://news.sky.com/story/1094514/woolwich-riot-police-contain-edl-supporters

 

[Macky]

War, it will be seen, is now a purely internal affair. In the past, the ruling groups of all countries, although they might recognize their common interest and therefore limit the destructiveness of war, did fight against one another, and the victor always plundered the vanquished. In our own day they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is not to make or prevent conquests of territory, but to keep the structure of society intact. The very word "war", therefore, has become misleading. It would probably be accurate to say that by becoming continuous, war has ceased to exist.

 

[Cate Fox]

What made me laugh was seeing the EDL members protesting, but all wearing balaclavas.... how brave of them. Did they not pick up on the fact that these murderers had cockney accents according to by-standers?!

 

[Real Sharapova]

What made me laugh was seeing the EDL members protesting, but all wearing balaclavas

It's not to conceal their identities, it's because they are right ugly pillocks.

 

[Matt_B]

What made me laugh was seeing the EDL members protesting, but all wearing balaclavas.... how brave of them. Did they not pick up on the fact that these murderers had cockney accents according to by-standers?!

Yet they don't agree with burkahs (sp)

 

[Rich B]

What made me laugh was seeing the EDL members protesting, but all wearing balaclavas.... how brave of them. Did they not pick up on the fact that these murderers had cockney accents according to by-standers?!

Probably because plod is more likely to arrest them than a loonytoon muslim with bloodstained hands

 

[Jeff]

Probably because plod is more likely to arrest them than a loonytoon muslim with bloodstained hands

Are you aware of any loonytoon muslim with bloodstained hands who hasn't been arrested?

 

[Blue Maniac]

Are you aware of any loonytoon muslim with bloodstained hands who hasn't been arrested?

There's a bloke who works in the halal butcher on Marfitt Street who's a bit bonkers.

 

[bocadillo]

Any idea why the 'shoot-to-kill' policy was not used in this case? I'm not advocating it; just always thought that the police considered that it was too dangerous simply to injure a person who was causing a threat.

 

[Matt_B]

Any idea why the 'shoot-to-kill' policy was not used in this case? I'm not advocating it; just always thought that the police considered that it was too dangerous simply to injure a person who was causing a threat.

Maybe the time between the attack and arrival was sufficient to lead them to believe they were no longer a threat?

 

[Jeff]

Any idea why the 'shoot-to-kill' policy was not used in this case? I'm not advocating it; just always thought that the police considered that it was too dangerous simply to injure a person who was causing a threat.

Maybe they didn't shoot to kill because they didn't have rucksacks.

 

[bocadillo]

Maybe the time between the attack and arrival was sufficient to lead them to believe they were no longer a threat?

So why shoot them at all?

I'm not sure that the same consideration has been made in similar incidents. They poliuce seemed happy enough to kill that bloke who was armed with a dangerous looking table leg in West (or was it East) Ham.

 

[Macky]

Any idea why the 'shoot-to-kill' policy was not used in this case?

Is there such a thing as a "shoot-to-kill" policy? If you shoot at somebody, you're likely to kill them

 

[FryattFox]

Is there such a thing as a "shoot-to-kill" policy? If you shoot at somebody, you're likely to kill them

 

[Lako42]

Is there such a thing as a "shoot-to-kill" policy? If you shoot at somebody, you're likely to kill them

If you are a trained armed response officer you're not.

 

[Macky]

If you are a trained armed response officer you're not.

How do you work that out? What are they trained to do, aim for the big toe and hope they don't bleed to death?

 

[M17TT C]

Well that was a laugh reading some of the comments in here, please carry on and provide entertainment for the afternoon too!

 

[Lako42]

How do you work that out? What are they trained to do, aim for the big toe and hope they don't bleed to death?

So you don't think it's possible for a trained marksman to shoot someone in a specific area to avoid death?

If you look on the news from yesterday there was a good example of this, oh wait a minute.

 

[Macky]

So you don't think it's possible for a trained marksman to shoot someone in a specific area to avoid death?

No, I don't.

If you look on the news from yesterday there was a good example of this, oh wait a minute.

No, it isn't.

 

[Mawsley]

EDL making the most of...

[video=youtube_share;g37HT4-EtzE]http://youtu.be/g37HT4-EtzE[/video]