escos66 said:does anyone else think its more than a coincedence that in the year we get three new kits from jjb their owner gets a new striker for his football club quite easily.
thers always a conspiracy theoristescos66 said:does anyone else think its more than a coincedence that in the year we get three new kits from jjb their owner gets a new striker for his football club quite easily.
i agree but its not them buying him i was questioning its us selling him without any fight were we maybe keeping the sponsers happy afterall all we hear from tim davies these days is how we are trying to make money seems to me like our football clubs main priority is to be a good business not a good team!Graz said:I really doubt that's why they bought Connolly! lol
They were desperate for a striker. Getting £2m for him is a very good deal, and if it goes to £3m then that's great!
escos66 said:does anyone else think its more than a coincedence that in the year we get three new kits from jjb their owner gets a new striker for his football club quite easily.
Fox Fan said:You might suspect the name changes for free might of had something to do with it being Wigan who got him.
yeh but both teams try to play football on a pitch in a stadium. ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......deff something fishy going on there.joe501 said:well that happened with piper and sunderland and us didnt have the same sponsor...
fcukcov said:yeh but both teams try to play football on a pitch in a stadium. ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......deff something fishy going on there.
escos66 said:does anyone else think its more than a coincedence that in the year we get three new kits from jjb their owner gets a new striker for his football club quite easily.
because the two biggest companies in the world (even though I think Adidas is now part of Reebok?) always look to sponser second rate teams in the second tier of their own domestic leagues?Avril Levein said:Like the theory, but seems unlikely. Our kit should be supplied by nike or adidas however
fcukcov said:because the two biggest companies in the world (even though I think Adidas is now part of Reebok?) always look to sponser second rate teams in the second tier of their own domestic leagues?
Fox Fan said:Reebok is now part of Adidas
fcukcov said:same difference.
drummindefender said:connolly has done pretty well in the prem so far dont you think ?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |