Mahrez

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lako42

Well-Known Member
Relates to the amount of transfer activity involving him.
 

Mike - True Blue Tinter

Well-Known Member
So our best player in these two games so far is the one that is leaving!

We truly are fecked if CS thinks that Gray can replace him at the moment.

Why the feck did we spend £30million+ on a striker who only appears to be able to use his feet for standing upright, rather than kicking the ball into the net?
 

FOX Franks

Well-Known Member
Blimey, that's good of him. Didn't realise Mahrez was the one that decided though.

Or... just shit journalism?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2038.jpg
    IMG_2038.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 49

Mike - True Blue Tinter

Well-Known Member
In all fairness, he did score yesterday!

Yes, but again with his head. Who is going to put in those particular type of crosses for him on a regular basis?

Mahrez, for maybe a few more weeks?

Albrighton, if he is on the appropriate wing?

Fuchs, with one of his excellent long throws, if he is picked?
 

City Fan

Well-Known Member
He already did he signed a five year contract.

Exactly, he chose to come here. No one forced him to. He can turn down a move to Rome if he wants to.
 

Lako42

Well-Known Member
Why the **** do players want to play for Arsenal?

From overachievers to embarrassing underachievers, great move.
 

fitz

Well-Known Member
Why the **** do players want to play for Arsenal?

From overachievers to embarrassing underachievers, great move.

Shit loads of money and the potential to sit entire seasons out on the treatment table. Plus he's French.
 

FOX Franks

Well-Known Member
You don't think he gets a right to decide where he plays his football and brings up his children?

I do, absolutely, but he doesn't get the opportunity to make the decision as to whether the club accepts the initial offer. Which is what the excerpt actually says.
 

Jeff

Administrator
Staff member
I do, absolutely, but he doesn't get the opportunity to make the decision as to whether the club accepts the initial offer. Which is what the excerpt actually says.

The thing that was posted is a copy of something the Sun said, not a quote from Mahrez. Nowhere in the article (here - https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/4077145/arsenal-transfer-news-riyad-mahrez-leicester/ ) does it contain a quote from Mahrez.
Nowhere in the article does it say what the source of this "information" is.
This is the same paper that a few days ago said Mahrez had agreed personal terms with Roma. Why would he do that if he only wants to go to Arsenal?

Typical tabloid nonsense.
 

TommyK

Well-Known Member
Lots of tabloid and Internet rubbish at the moment. I wonder how much comes from Mahrez agent and how much is tabloid BS. I would imagine (hope) that whenever the price tag of 30-35 million is mentioned that is his agent desperately trying to bring his price down.

The market has gone insane. We should be demanding a minimum of 45 million.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top