Speculation Next Leicester manager

[Lako42]

Tunch would have that back to 45

 

[Profondo Rosso]

Yes obvious, hence the rhetoricalness (if that's a word) of the question.

But you asked it as if there wasn't an answer.

 

[bocadillo]

Yes obvious, hence the rhetoricalness (if that's a word) of the question.

The word you were looking for is simply 'rhetoric. Although Americans, who use the word 'burglarize' when the mean 'burgle' and 'burglarization' when they mean 'burglary', would probably disagree.

 

[Mike - True Blue Tinter]

We were a more direct team under NP though, that much I think we can agree on.

No problem with being direct. One of West Ham's goals was Goalie > Flick on > Volley, in much the same way as we used to have Walker > Deane > Dickov > Goal.

And Schmeichel has an enormous kick to provide the service - Schmeichel > Howard > Nugent > Goal.

 

[drummindefender]

Think king might have been involved

 

[Mawsley]

We were far from just a hoofing side under Pearson, the concept is ridiculous, we just didn't play the ball out from defence.

Davies, Spearing & Cleverly all played key roles in an attacking midfield. King's marauding goals didn't come about from picking up long balls.

 

[Profondo Rosso]

We were far from just a hoofing side under Pearson, the concept is ridiculous, we just didn't play the ball out from defence.

Davies, Spearing & Cleverly all played key roles in an attacking midfield. King's marauding goals didn't come about from picking up long balls.

I completely agree, plus this idea that we played some hoof ball to Howard in the Championship is silly. Howard was on the bench more often than not in that season and only really played a big part towards the end of that season.

For the majority of that season we played 4-3-3 with Fryatt up front and Waghorn and Gallagher on the wings. (Then Waghorn up front with Dyer and Gallagher on the wings when Fryatt got injured).

 

[Mawsley]

I'd say we played far more hoofball under Kelly, always pumping it to Hume for the flick on.

 

[spionfox]

The word you were looking for is simply 'rhetoric. Although Americans, who use the word 'burglarize' when the mean 'burgle' and 'burglarization' when they mean 'burglary', would probably disagree.

Is 'buggerize' one of theirs too?

 

[bocadillo]

Is 'buggerize' one of theirs too?

I believe they do use the word, in the sense of causing something to foul up or stop working as it should.

 

[drew]

I believe they do use the word, in the sense of causing something to foul up or stop working as it should.

Just checked, not as far as the wife is concerned.

 

[Jeff]

Just checked, not as far as the wife is concerned.

Did you not find that out before you married her?

 

[pork pie fox]

The word you were looking for is simply 'rhetoric. Although Americans, who use the word 'burglarize' when the mean 'burgle' and 'burglarization' when they mean 'burglary', would probably disagree.

'Winningest' is my favourite American word

 

[Macky]

Is 'buggerize' one of theirs too?

Yes, definitely, it's spelt 'buggerise' in English

 

[Scotfox]

Just read Foxtalk ( sorry), a Huddersfield fan has just posted. he reckons that Clark is on the way here. Apparently said goodbye to the fans on Saturday. Today had a meeting with the players he apparently wouldn't divulge the nature of his discussion to anyone. Could be something could be shite. I guess we will find out in due course.

 

[Scotfox]

Another Huddy fan saying the first one is talking shite

 

[Mawsley]

Hmm, who to believe?

 

[fox58]

Hmm, who to believe?

no doubt one of them will be right

 

[Jeff]

Hmm, who to believe?

One of these maybe... http://downatthemac.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=61918&page=1

 

[Scotfox]

I'm beginning to worry about you Jeff