Steve Walsh vs Matt Elliot

[DesertFox]

Elliot - he was the better player.

 

[BOB HAZELL]

I dont feel the need to pit 2 city greats against each other at all.

both gave me great times as a city fan and i love em both the same for it.

God bless two real footballers of the leicester variety, weve had none since

Nice sentiment - even though I voted for Walshie on this when it was around years ago, I'd probably agree with the above.

Love 'em both.

 

[alex]

Any news Bob?

 

[homer]

Any news Bob?

Small accidental fire at the Haymarket - or maybe it was a terrorist attack, hard to tell

Do keep up, Alex

 

[alex]

I am starting to think you hate me Homey....

 

[Deanos Beano]

Walsh - nobody has yet to even come close!!!

Elliott was a good player but cost £1.8m, Walshie cost £100,000. I know times changed but Walshie wore his heart on his sleeve and nobody ever gave more for the city cause.

 

[SilverFox]

Can't and won't choose.

 

[alex]

Walsh - nobody has yet to even come close!!!

Elliott was a good player but cost £1.8m, Walshie cost £100,000. I know times changed but Walshie wore his heart on his sleeve and nobody ever gave more for the city cause.

I have.

 

[stevewalshwasgod]

Walsh - nobody has yet to even come close!!!

Elliott was a good player but cost £1.8m, Walshie cost £100,000. I know times changed but Walshie wore his heart on his sleeve and nobody ever gave more for the city cause.

hear hear!!!!!!