Joe_Fox said:Oh dear, we are now 9 for 2 after 4 overs.
Projected score of 113 runs. :-(
Joe_Fox said:Half way through the innings and we have a measely total on 77 for 4 (25 overs).
We'll need about a run a ball if we are to win this one now. I tough task against these bowlers.
Joe_Fox said:Warwickshire finished on 235 for 9 (50 overs)
So the projection of 260 was not bad. MKFox, eat your stetson sunshine!
Firsty said:134 for 4 after 27.1 overs.
Secondly said:Half way through the innings and we have a measely total on 77 for 4.
Joe_Fox said:If you take a snap shot of the score about half way through the innings then my projections (and they are projections because they use a mathematical equation and therefore are defined as projections by the english mathematical dictionary) are not far off at all:
Firsty said:134 for 4 after 27.1 overs.
This would have produced the equation of (300/((27*6)+1))*134 = 247
Warwickshire actually ended on 235.
Secondly said:Half way through the innings and we have a measely total on 77 for 4.
This would have produced the equation of (300/(25*6))*77 = 154
Leicestershire actually ended on 152
So in hindsight my projections were good. So, in hindsight, up yours.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Blackburn | 0 | 0 |
2 | Bristol City | 0 | 0 |
3 | Burnley | 0 | 0 |
4 | Cardiff City | 0 | 0 |
5 | Coventry City | 0 | 0 |
6 | Derby | 0 | 0 |
7 | Hull City | 0 | 0 |
8 | Leeds Utd | 0 | 0 |
9 | Luton Town | 0 | 0 |
10 | Middlesbro | 0 | 0 |
11 | Millwall | 0 | 0 |
12 | Norwich City | 0 | 0 |
13 | Oxford Utd | 0 | 0 |
14 | Plymouth | 0 | 0 |
15 | Portsmouth | 0 | 0 |
16 | Preston | 0 | 0 |
17 | QPR | 0 | 0 |
18 | Sheffield W | 0 | 0 |
19 | Stoke City | 0 | 0 |
20 | Sunderland | 0 | 0 |
21 | Swansea City | 0 | 0 |
22 | Watford | 0 | 0 |
23 | West Brom | 0 | 0 |
24 | Sheffield Utd | 0 | -2 |