Durham Fox
El Dude Brother.
Its gone back to the old selection of just a few....
Durham Fox said:Its gone back to the old selection of just a few....
Fukk 'em, invest more, gain more.webmaster said:I changed it yesterday when I realised it didn't fit on the screen properly using lower resolutions.
Durham Fox said:This is really annoying me now, we have half the quick smilies we did. If you noticed it didnt fit low res screens Jeff then it sounds like nobody using a bloody BBC or an Acorn has moaned.....
Durham Fox said:If you noticed it didnt fit low res screens Jeff then it sounds like nobody using a bloody BBC or an Acorn has moaned.....
Jeff said:I noticed it just after adding the tumbleweed one, which is wider than the others and was distorting the display. Maybe I should remove the tumbleweed one.
Durham Fox said:Can the tumbelweed go in the main box but not on the quick box?? Would that solve it???
Jeff said:Th number of smilies on the enhanced editor (which most people use) has gone from 30 to 21, which is not much of a change.
I didn't realise I'd changed the number on the wysiwyg editor, which you're using. How many can you see now, and how many did you used to see?
Durham Fox said:wysiwyg is back to 3 rows of 3. Which doesnt even contain a basic wink or luaghing smilie.
Jeff said:How many did you used to have?
Durham Fox said:Cant quite remember whether it was 4 or 5 rows.
Durham Fox said:Not the best quality but you get the picture...
webmaster said:You've got seven rows of three on there, you said you'd only got 3x3
Durham Fox said:Sorry meant 3 rows of 7 :icon_roll
Its still less, there is no laughing smilie or winking one. It seems to have reverted to the original settings Jeff where it chooses a random selection each time.
webmaster said:FFS, the way people were reacting I thought there was a serious problem, it's only changed from 30 to 21, hardly worth the "where have all the smilies gone" or "we have half the quick smilies we did" type comments. Makes me realise how much I hated working in a PC support job, people never properly describe the problem they're having.
The way it's selecting them hasn't changed, but maybe it's more noticeable that some are chnging when there are fewer there.
I don't want to make it any wider, but I'll change the number of rows instead, to bring it closer to the number we had before.
webmaster said:Are you aware that by clicking the smilie face above the edit box you can quickly select from a lot more smilies?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 45 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 45 | 93 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 45 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 45 | 84 |
5 | Norwich City | 45 | 73 |
6 | West Brom | 45 | 72 |
7 | Hull City | 45 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 45 | 66 |
9 | Coventry City | 45 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 45 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 45 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 45 | 62 |
13 | Swansea City | 45 | 57 |
14 | Watford | 45 | 56 |
15 | Sunderland | 45 | 56 |
16 | Millwall | 45 | 56 |
17 | QPR | 45 | 53 |
18 | Stoke City | 45 | 53 |
19 | Blackburn | 45 | 50 |
20 | Sheffield W | 45 | 50 |
21 | Plymouth | 45 | 48 |
22 | Birmingham | 45 | 47 |
23 | Huddersfield | 45 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 45 | 24 |