3-5-2

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

discojoe

New Member
sounds to me like we have got the players now to try the 352 formation then that would give stearman more chance of playing and canero is a right WINGER not an orthodox right back and stewart or wilcox could play on the left what do u lot think
 
discojoe said:
sounds to me like we have got the players now to try the 352 formation then that would give stearman more chance of playing and canero is a right WINGER not an orthodox right back and stewart or wilcox could play on the left what do u lot think

Good point. We don't seem to have any genuine full-backs. As you say Wilcox, Stewart and Canero are more suited as wing backs.
 
I would go 4-4-2. Especially when the older defenders like Keown and Elliot start, you'll need wingbacks for defensive cover..just to fill the gaps were a lack of pace can be exploited.
 
After 2 years of never playing 3-5-2 you think we will?

NO CHANCE!!!
 
Keown comes from a team that has played the 4-4-2 formation better than any other team

Why on earth would we switch to 3-5-2 ???
 
MA just won't play 3-5-2. we have potential for cracking wing-backs but we don't have anyone in the Walsh/Taggart/Gilchrist style to fit in on the left side of the central 3 yet. It is essential to have a left-footer there. Stearman is left-footed isn't he?

anyway, as already said, Keown is a master of the back 4 so I doubt we'd switch to 3-5-2 after bringing him in.

SamJ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Bournemouth00
2Arsenal00
3Aston Villa00
4Brentford00
5Brighton00
6Chelsea00
7Palace00
8Everton00
9Fulham00
10Ipswich00
11Leicester00
12Liverpool00
13Manchester C  00
14Manchester U00
15Newcastle00
16Nottm F00
17Southampton00
18Tottenham 00
19West Ham00
20Wolves00

Latest posts

Back
Top