Bad web host - 000webhost

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matt_B

Well-Known Member
I have a feeling that somewhere on here I recommended using this company as a good, free web host. If I did, I take it back. Do not use them or their sister company hosting24.com.

Full details here
 
I have a feeling that somewhere on here I recommended using this company as a good, free web host. If I did, I take it back. Do not use them or their sister company hosting24.com.

Full details here

Unscrupulous maybe. But the old adage that you get what you pay for seems pretty apt too :icon_wink
 
Unscrupulous maybe. But the old adage that you get what you pay for seems pretty apt too :icon_wink

Like I said in the article, you expect certain things to be different to advertised due to the no cost factor, but certain things you don't expect. There are plenty of people who need free hosting and it wouldn't be worth the cost to pay for it. If the banks accepted peoples money then suddenly stopped giving it back unless they upgraded their accounts then people would grumble!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4494
2Leeds Utd4590
3Ipswich4490
4Southampton4584
5Norwich City4573
6West Brom4572
7Hull City4570
8Middlesbro4566
9Coventry City4464
10Preston 4463
11Bristol City4562
12Cardiff City4562
13Swansea City4557
14Watford4556
15Sunderland4556
16Millwall4556
17QPR4553
18Stoke City4553
19Blackburn 4550
20Sheffield W4550
21Plymouth 4548
22Birmingham4547
23Huddersfield4545
24Rotherham Utd4524
Top