Drinkwater charged

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well the rest might do him some good . He must be knackered !
Yea but hiz payed doublz now so shud be able to ply doublz the game.

Lazeh ****
 
King/Armartey didnt work at old trafford,id put Okizaki with King,if Danny gets a 3 game ban does Champions League count? hope so because he wouldnt be needed in Porto ie would miss Middlesborough Sunderland Porto , back for Man City game
 
Looks like an elbow but difficult to see how much contact. Player as usual drops as if blasted with a shotgun! I hope the jury will not be judging on the basis of that particular clip!

Why is it the Watford player is not disciplined for pulling his shirt and preventing him from getting back in position? That is why he was elbowed it was to get the player of his shirt IMO
 
Why is it the Watford player is not disciplined for pulling his shirt and preventing him from getting back in position?


Simply because the ref didn't see it. Fouls are not the subject of retrospective action; violent conduct is.
 
The same Watford player had a tussle with Gray. He was at it all game, typical Italian style game Watford play including the wind ups, play acting and all that comes with it. I know we also play a similar game in a counter attacking style with some play acting but not to the level Watford do.
 
Is there any difference in punishment as to whether the player admits the charge, 'fair cop guv', or says 'it was unintentional, I was just trying to pull away'?
 
Is there any difference in punishment as to whether the player admits the charge, 'fair cop guv', or says 'it was unintentional, I was just trying to pull away'?

The standard punishment is a 3-game ban. It can be varied when the punishment is found to be 'clearly excessive' or 'clearly insufficient'.

If a player appeals against a sending-off or, in cases like Drinkwater's, does not accept the charge if he is then found guilty, the disciplinary committee will consider the merits of the appeal and if it feels that the appeal had no chance of succeeding the punishment may be increased up to double the original length of the suspension.
 
On reflection, is nobody even slightly annoyed with Drinkwater here for being a total arse and getting himself banned for three matches?

Is he beyond criticism?
 
On reflection, is nobody even slightly annoyed with Drinkwater here for being a total arse and getting himself banned for three matches?

Is he beyond criticism?

Did not look any different to what Huth was doing most matches last season and getting away with.

However, Drinkwater has seen the refs clamping down on our best defensive tactic, so he was a prat for doing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1946
2Arsenal2040
3Nottm F2040
4Chelsea2036
5Newcastle2035
6Manchester C  2034
7Bournemouth2033
8Aston Villa2032
9Fulham2030
10Brighton2028
11Brentford2027
12Tottenham 2024
13Manchester U2023
14West Ham2023
15Palace2021
16Everton1917
17Wolves2016
18Ipswich2016
19Leicester2014
20Southampton206
Back
Top