stevewalshwasgod
New Member
pc or psp spanky?
FM2007 Handheld
- Thread starter stevewalshwasgod
- Start date
- Status
Richie_d123
Well-Known Member
is there much difference? other than the obvious larger database on a pc
Spanky Fox
New Member
PC version, i have just beat everton in the league cup and now im playing newcastle im in the last 16. top of the league with a 3point gap, ian hume is really good on the wing with matt jansen on the other side and i got fryatt upfrnt
stevewalshwasgod
New Member
Ive just ordered that
I have psp version as well for holidays etc
Spanky Fox
New Member
Ive just ordered that
well i need to pick up the proper one im just playing the demo untill i go back to england and install the actual one.
Hazzman
New Member
It's always easy on the demo. That's how they get you to buy it.
They are different. Certain players become good on one version, others not so.
Keep at it though, I did crap on PSP for starters but I have now had successful spells at Newcastle, Rangers, Doncaster (relegation after being promoted however) and Colchester (who I am currently and mid-table in Championship after being promoted).
You're tactics are more important than you're players. It may be need for you to change them every game.
Spanky Fox
New Member
Tatics is where all the time goes, i have great tatics at the moment, fryatt has scored in everygame and i have only lost one game so far in 15 so its not bad, but sometimes the team just perform fecking shite but they win thats the good thing
indierich06
Active Member
Try and get hold of Denilson on loan from Arsenal, quality holding midfielder and you should be able to get him on season long loan. Also, Michael Mancienne, who you get on loan from Chelsea, is also awesome. Combined, these two will give you a pretty solid midfield and defence. I've just started a new game with Leicester and with these two in my team, I haven't conceded a goal in 5 games. My only problem is that my team don't score many either! :icon_cry:
Spanky Fox
New Member
matty fryatt doesn't stop scoring for my team, i dont know why and matt jansen has scored alot aswell
stevewalshwasgod
New Member
I have had better sucess for fm 2006 but will give 2007 ago now
Han
Active Member
2006 was lots easier than 2007.
It's much more difficult to tailor your tactics depending on each opponent. in 2006 i just tended to have 2 tactics, one for hard matches and one for easier ones. Now you have to check the other teams tactics, think about player morale and then get the team talks right. It's easier when you've got a settled team and a bit of a reputation.
It's much more difficult to tailor your tactics depending on each opponent. in 2006 i just tended to have 2 tactics, one for hard matches and one for easier ones. Now you have to check the other teams tactics, think about player morale and then get the team talks right. It's easier when you've got a settled team and a bit of a reputation.
Hazzman
New Member
You've hit the nail on the head.
Help if you play a settled team as well, which is hard considering the fixture congestion on it.
I found 2006 too easy because all you had to do was picking up cheap Brazilians, the same thing is there just look at non-league football. Kettering seem to have an amazing academy on it.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
| 2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
| 3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
| 4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
| 5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
| 6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
| 7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
| 8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
| 9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
| 10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
| 11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
| 12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
| 14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
| 15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
| 16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
| 17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
| 18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
| 19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
| 20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |
