Guppy and Hignett released by Leeds

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
We shouldn't have got rid of Guppy IMO.
 
We shouldn't have got rid of Guppy IMO.
 
JF, why do you think Leeds got rid, because they were brill?
We' ve all got to stop this "we should have kept him/ them etc"
The long and the short of it is, they have gone. Micky has now got a different set of players. Time will tell if they are good enough.Before Mr Elsby comes on and starts whining about 49 games this 49 games that. Change the bloody record, you are getting boring. Those 49 games are history(no mention of the 40 odd games prior to that, why?). Lets see what is to come. :roll:
I'm not gonna say keep the faith coz it would be wasted on a few of you! :evil:
 
xsubmariner said:
JF, why do you think Leeds got rid, because they were brill?
We' ve all got to stop this "we should have kept him/ them etc"
The long and the short of it is, they have gone. Micky has now got a different set of players. Time will tell if they are good enough.Before Mr Elsby comes on and starts whining about 49 games this 49 games that. Change the bloody record, you are getting boring. Those 49 games are history(no mention of the 40 odd games prior to that, why?). Lets see what is to come. :roll:
I'm not gonna say keep the faith coz it would be wasted on a few of you! :evil:

Everyone blames the bad run on muzzy leaving, but he was there in most of the 49 games?
 
step said:
I thought guppy scored a couple of weeks ago

He did. They were both only signed on a one-month contract anyway... Hignett has been 'snapped up' by Darlington.
 
We could have done with Guppy taking the free-kicks in the Brighton game, as Stewart's delivieries were awful!
 
xsubmariner said:
JF, why do you think Leeds got rid, because they were brill?
We' ve all got to stop this "we should have kept him/ them etc"
The long and the short of it is, they have gone. Micky has now got a different set of players. Time will tell if they are good enough.Before Mr Elsby comes on and starts whining about 49 games this 49 games that. Change the bloody record, you are getting boring. Those 49 games are history(no mention of the 40 odd games prior to that, why?). Lets see what is to come. :roll:
I'm not gonna say keep the faith coz it would be wasted on a few of you! :evil:

Leeds got rid cos they have about as much money as I do in my back pocket!
 
xsubmariner said:
JF, why do you think Leeds got rid, because they were brill?
We' ve all got to stop this "we should have kept him/ them etc"
The long and the short of it is, they have gone. Micky has now got a different set of players. Time will tell if they are good enough.Before Mr Elsby comes on and starts whining about 49 games this 49 games that. Change the bloody record, you are getting boring. Those 49 games are history(no mention of the 40 odd games prior to that, why?). Lets see what is to come. :roll:
I'm not gonna say keep the faith coz it would be wasted on a few of you! :evil:
Agree with what you are saying but, i really would have kept him, he cant do much now other than put in crosses, but at least its a more effective contribution than wilcox or stewart
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114
Back
Top