Danny Cad deserves a contract, he's changed the pace of a couple of games and shown more desire and professionalism than any other of the current plonkers.
He deserves the right to at least be called up for pre-season training and for the new manager to take a look at him.
Couldn't agree more.
Couldn't agree less.
He's trouble. He's nowhere near good enough to be worth it. No way he'll stay.
He's paid his way this season just by earning the replay at fulham. give him another year.
Couldn't agree less.
He's trouble. He's nowhere near good enough to be worth it. No way he'll stay.
Why do you say that? Seems overly harsh to me.
Fcuk them all off, none of them have done enough to show they can take us to the next level.
Ask yourself why a manager who gave this fella a chance to redeem himself suddenly bombed him out of the squad and then out on loan despite our inability to score/create goals?
RK wasn't the best but there were non footballing reasons for this. The guy is trouble and the last sort of influence the young players at this club need right now.
In footballing terms, the guy went from the top half of the Prem to the bottom of the third division in no time at all. Even before his drugs ban, nobody at our level was interested.
He makes a couple of 20 minute cameos and suddenly is worth a contract and all the baggage he brings with him? No thanks.
One step at a time BG; we're going all out for 18th next season. 12 more years and we'll be in the payoffs. Yay! :icon_razz :icon_rollto the giddy heights of say 15th?
Ask yourself why a manager who gave this fella a chance to redeem himself suddenly bombed him out of the squad and then out on loan despite our inability to score/create goals?
RK wasn't the best but there were non footballing reasons for this. The guy is trouble and the last sort of influence the young players at this club need right now.
In footballing terms, the guy went from the top half of the Prem to the bottom of the third division in no time at all. Even before his drugs ban, nobody at our level was interested.
He makes a couple of 20 minute cameos and suddenly is worth a contract and all the baggage he brings with him? No thanks.
Ask yourself why a manager who gave this fella a chance to redeem himself suddenly bombed him out of the squad and then out on loan despite our inability to score/create goals?
RK wasn't the best but there were non footballing reasons for this. The guy is trouble and the last sort of influence the young players at this club need right now.
In footballing terms, the guy went from the top half of the Prem to the bottom of the third division in no time at all. Even before his drugs ban, nobody at our level was interested.
He makes a couple of 20 minute cameos and suddenly is worth a contract and all the baggage he brings with him? No thanks.
... the bottom line is that he is not going to cut it in any meaningful way and given the apparantly poor attitudes of the players as a whole is someone we are better without.
...
It could be a case of what's in the baggageWhat is all this baggage that you think he brings with him?
I've asked myself lots of questions about Rob Kelly's decision making process
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |