I'd rather....

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was being ironic trust me but I really am fully against Tigers taking over our stadium it just wouldn't be Leicester City Football Club there anymore. I can't believe that the board would even consider let alone accept the offer. I can understand why the green seats would be a problem and I'm glad of this because this would probably cause the deal to fall through. Blue and white are LCFC's traditional colours throughout their history (correct me if I'm wrong) so it wouldn't seem like our pitch. Still Forest do have a few decent players we could use :lol: :wink: .

LFC doesn't that have a ring to it.
We're by far the greatest team
the world has ever seen
and our name is forest
Leicester forest FC

:wink:
 
Sam said:
I am being ironic you know

I'm not quite sure that you either understand what irony is or would be able to express it if you did. Sorry about that.

However, whilst i can see that there are real reasons why traditionalists - I am not including you in that Sam because I'm not at all sure that you have any particular sense of what Leicester City's tradition is - would be opposed to this idea - I still think that its actually a way forward which would benefit the long term development of LCFC in terms of ability to compete above the level of a perpetual yo yo outfit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top