Should Lisandro Martínez have been sent off for his challenge on Cole Palmer? That and all the other big VAR situations this weekend in the Premier League.
www.espn.co.uk
Possible penalty: Issahaku challenge on Chaplin
What happened: Ipswich Town had a free kick in the 77th minute. After a melee inside the area the ball fell to
Conor Chaplin.
Fatawu Issahaku came running out and collided with the Ipswich player, who went to ground. Referee Tim Robinson allowed play to continue, which resulted in
Kalvin Phillips fouling
Ricardo Pereira and picking up his second yellow card. The VAR, Stuart Attwell, checked for a possible penalty.
VAR decision: No penalty.
Should Fatawu Issahaku have given away a penalty for pushing over Conor Chaplin?
VAR review: Ipswich have endured a baptism of fire to life with VAR. Mark Ashton, the club's chairman and CEO, pulled no punches
in an interview on Friday, saying "we will not go quietly into the night," and that "[PGMOL chief refereeing officer] Howard [Webb] is going to see my number flashing up a hell of a lot more." And those comments came before Saturday's events.
All clubs will, naturally, feel they should be getting more decisions than they do. Perhaps for Ipswich -- the only club in the division who hadn't experienced VAR before -- expectation levels needed to be lowered and they need to realise that subjective interventions don't happen all that often.
No club can ever get every decision they want -- because most calls sit in the subjective grey area where either decision is acceptable; there's no definitive
right call.
Ipswich sit at the bottom of the VAR overturns table this season, with three going against them and not one in their favour. But while Ipswich may feel aggrieved, the KMI Panel has judged that all three decisions were correct, and there hasn't been a missed VAR intervention which should have gone their way.
Many are going to disagree, but while the challenge on Issahaku could be a penalty on the field, it probably doesn't meet the Premier League's high bar for an intervention.
Against Man City at the start of the season, Ipswich were denied a penalty and the KMI Panel ruled that while it should have been awarded by the referee, the VAR was right not to get involved -- it would be no surprise if the same decision was reached on this too. It leaves Ipswich with grounds for complaint with refereeing, but also frustration with VAR process.
If the penalty had been awarded through VAR then Phillips' second yellow card would have stood. The only cards that are rescinded are those directly resulted to the play, such as through DOGSO (Denying an Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity), and not those issued for other disciplinary matters.
Verdict: As referee Robinson saw the incident and described it as a collision between the players, it goes down as referee's call.