League Table Puzzle

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
not if its just a printing mistake ie boldham only played 2 instead of 3 :102:

this is where your argument starts...

is there an out and out typo, does one error here mean anohter somewhere else

took me 2 sodding hours!
 
Boldham Won 1 Drew 2 Lost 1

What about this?

Everything else stays the same!
 
Last edited:
is correct, you guess it or arrive at it logically?

I worked it out

Realised the Boldham results were the only ones that werent possible as it said won 3 when they only scored 2, went on from there.
 
I worked it out

Realised the Boldham results were the only ones that werent possible as it said won 3 when they only scored 2, went on from there.

so what were all the results?
 
I worked it out

Realised the Boldham results were the only ones that werent possible as it said won 3 when they only scored 2, went on from there.


fecking hell yeah good spot :icon_roll:icon_redf:icon_lol:
 
:icon_roll

He did what I did at the start of this bloody thread.

Typed this into Google:

Arnsley 2 1 1 2 2 Boldham 3 1 0 2 1 Cleeds

Please dont class me as being as pathetic as you Melts :icon_wink
 
2-0
0-0
0-0
0-1


actually i meant the lot, but i think you've got it

bravo

it was in New Scientist, don't see why they asked for Arnsley's results... cos there aren't any errors there, must be to dummy you

they should ask for all the ten results
 
Please dont class me as being as pathetic as you Melts :icon_wink
Define pathetic, and tell me why you come up with that conclusion, and please feel free to remove the wink
 
:icon_roll
I see nothing wrong with questioning an insult I receive, I think it's better than filing complaints like other posters do.

Anway, I'm glad you have no foundations for your insult, it does make feel a tad better.
 
I see nothing wrong with questioning an insult I receive, I think it's better than filing complaints like other posters do.

Anway, I'm glad you have no foundations for your insult, it does make feel a tad better.

I was suggesting that people who have to revert to researching puzzle questions on the internet are pathetic and as you claimed that's what you did, i refered to you as being pathetic.

I added the wink so that you wouldnt over react, I then added the roll eyes icon as I felt you had over reacted to my initial post.

I have now written this post to explain myself.

:icon_roll

(Note: If you would like me to explain the roll eyes icon please let me know)
 
I was suggesting that people who have to revert to researching puzzle questions on the internet are pathetic and as you claimed that's what you did, i refered to you as being pathetic.
That's all I wanted to know, and I agree with you.

I researched the answer so I could find out how easy it would be to cheat. I won't join in any quizzes where somebody else could cheat against me easily, it defeats the object of playing

As a result I didn't join in. I kept the answer to myself and let others enjoy themselves.

I kinda thought that wasn't pathetic, but you're entitled to your opinion of me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1536
2Chelsea1634
3Arsenal1733
4Nottm F1731
5Aston Villa1728
6Manchester C  1727
7Newcastle1726
8Bournemouth1625
9Brighton1725
10Fulham1624
11Tottenham 1623
12Brentford1723
13Manchester U1622
14West Ham1720
15Palace1716
16Everton1515
17Leicester1614
18Ipswich1712
19Wolves169
20Southampton165
Back
Top