Feidlimid
Active Member
Hence my question. Maybe the board have decided that their offices need a refurb.What’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR
Hence my question. Maybe the board have decided that their offices need a refurb.What’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR
It’s for the independent consultants to analyse where Rudkin and Whelan definitely haven’t made any mistakesWhat’s the point in borrowing money when we can barely spend anyway thanks to PSR.
We are indeed allowed to borrow from them. No idea why they keep borrowing from these sharks. Enormous interest sounds fun.We don't know what it will be used for. We assume the tranfer kitty, or to assist cash flow, or whatever
What I don't get is why we're taking such loans when we have a supposed money bags owner. Are we not allowed to borrow from Top/KP? Have we reached the limit on that source?
They are just a bank, and probably have more favourable interest rates. Better than going to say Barclays.We are indeed allowed to borrow from them. No idea why they keep borrowing from these sharks. Enormous interest sounds fun.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |