Nottingham Fox
Moderator
Odds from #####
Last edited by a moderator:
Just noticed the 12-1 on "Any Barnsley player to score 1st"
Based on league matches so far this season evens would be fair odds, so 12-1 looks to be more than a little generous. I think Nottingham Fox is trying to bankrupt vbookie :icon_bigg
:icon_lol:
The bookie has risked his reputation on this one. So far i've done ok. 15,149 vcash staked and only paid out 7,453 vcash. I can take the hit should it come off, but a clean sheet or them to score after us seems more likely IMO
Youre ****ed, admit it. Hauled in for one of Jeff's special disciplinaries on Monday morning
I see newtonfox has placed virtual money on a Leicester win, a draw and Leicester losing. Am I just tired or am I missing something in the odds?
I see newtonfox has placed virtual money on a Leicester win, a draw and Leicester losing. Am I just tired or am I missing something in the odds?
i was not sure which way this one would go so coverd all
Just noticed the 12-1 on "Any Barnsley player to score 1st"
Based on league matches so far this season evens would be fair odds, so 12-1 looks to be more than a little generous. I think Nottingham Fox is trying to bankrupt vbookie :icon_bigg
Just noticed the 12-1 on "Any Barnsley player to score 1st"
Based on league matches so far this season evens would be fair odds, so 12-1 looks to be more than a little generous. I think Nottingham Fox is trying to bankrupt vbookie :icon_bigg
I think you should seek help for your vgambling problem.
where the doc
Not for the first time: http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showpost.php?p=343787&postcount=10
But on that occasion, you seemed to think it was OK:http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showpost.php?p=343787&postcount=10
Not the same thing.
The one you linked to was to pay out for the first Leicester scorer in the match, which meant the odds offered were maybe twice what they normally would be, which is a good special offer, but not too extreme. Although I have just noticed that the odds offered for no Leicester scorer in that match were way too generous.
The odds for any barnsley player to score first were about ten times what they should be, when the odds are out by that much it distorts the betting.
You're splitting hairs. In both instances prices were higher than would normally be expected. The degree of the inadvertent manipulation of the odds is irrelevant. And as you so correctly pointed out, vcash is not real.
You're splitting hairs. In both instances prices were higher than would normally be expected. The degree of the inadvertent manipulation of the odds is irrelevant. And as you so correctly pointed out, vcash is not real.
Sounds like some people want to be dead serious about it so from now on, there will be no more 'Special' bets or offers !
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |