Yeah, probably.What changes would you have made? Albrighton for one of the CB's?
It leaves us horribly exposed at the back when they do.Castagne and Ricardo will spend more time attacking than defending
I don’t disagree with that, but if it means shoe horning them into a formation that has been largely unsuccessful this season, I don’t think we should be starting out best 11 fit players.
Albrighton instead of Soyuncu who hasn’t had a great last few games, and we could have gone 4-2-3-1
Exposed to what, Mcburnie and Brewster I could stuff a Sunday roast down followed by steamed syrup pudding with a couple of bottles of red and still put those two in my pocketIt leaves us horribly exposed at the back when they do.
I get that. It’s hard to be too critical when we have so many injuries, so I understand it. I think I’d just prefer not to do it still.I mean, I just don't have an issue with it.
Fofana will step out of the back a lot, the full backs will be pushed on when appropriate and we have, in theory, 3 strikers on the pitch.
We aren't flush with options, so I'm not going to be too critical about setup.
What?****ing hell
BN with his predictionsWhat?
Ah!BN with his predictions
****ing hell
Perez?And if you put Albrighton in for one of the centre backs, we have no one to play on the other wing anyway
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |