Line Up Vs Watford

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.

PFKAKTF FOX

Well-Known Member
This would be my line up to face Watford on tuesday night, bearing in mind the mobility and pace Watford possess especially out wide, I would drop Johansson to the bench and employ an out and out left back.

My team would be :

Douglas

Maybury
McCarthy
Gerrbrand
Sheehan

Kisnorbo
Hughes
Gudjonsson

Hume
MDV
Smith

Subs
Dublin
Tiatto
Hammond
Williams
Johansson
 
Defence has been pretty good recently. Hume & De Vries ok up front with Hammond coming on at some point. In Kisnorbo & Gudjonsson we basically have two holding midfielders therefore I would play Smith with Hughes as the two creative men in front of Paddy & Joey. It would mean also that the two full backs would have to do some attacking work on the flanks which would allow the attacking midfielders to support the strikers. It's A home match and we should be approaching it positively.
 
May as well have my 5 Bobs worth..

Douglas
Maybury
Gerrbrand
McCarthy
Johannsson
Hammill
Hughes
Gudjonnsson
Smith
Hume
MDV

Henderson
Stearman
Kisnorbo
Dublin..
Williams


And most importantly play with a fast tempo from Kick off.
 
Last edited:
I'd go for:

Douglas

Maybury
Gerrbrand
McCarthy
Tiatto (think he will start having come on at LB yesterday)

Smith (he can play right side I think?)
Hughes
Gudjonsson
Hammill

De Vries
Hume


If Smith doesn't play as well on the right, then maybe stick Hume right wing with Hammond up front, or vice versa. Means the team is more attacking, and gets Sylla out the team
 
Surely we must leave the defence as it is,start tinkering with it and well start to leak goals again IMO.I'll be amazed if ,barring injuries,CL changes the Defence.I fear Sylla starting though:icon_sad:
 
highland fox said:
Surely we must leave the defence as it is,start tinkering with it and well start to leak goals again IMO.I'll be amazed if ,barring injuries,CL changes the Defence.I fear Sylla starting though:icon_sad:
Agreed, don't tinker with the defence. One reason for the improvement is that they are playing regulary and have built a understanding. Maybe thats what we have got to do with the two front men, decide who are the best two and stick with them for a few matches so they built up a relationship on the pitch. As for the midfield it a matter of opinion who should be there. I certainly would like to see Smith & Hughes play together for a period but not sure who else to play with them. Joey or Paddy as the holding player then it's a choice of many for the wide player. Hammil/Tiatto on the left or Sylla/Hammond on the right. Once we have a settled side it might help.
 
I dont agree, Nissa has struggled on a number of occasions at left back and TBH the only reason we havent been punished is because of the excellent partnership now being forged by the 2 Patrick's. Tinkering with one player IMO would not hinder but help improve what has become a weak link. We have to stop this square pegs in round holes scenario.
 
Douglas

Maybury
Gerrbrand
McCarthy
Sheehan

Hammond
Hughes
Gudjonsson
Smith

Hume
de Vries

Subs: Henderson, Stearman, Johansson, Williams, Graham

No chance of having that line-up though...
 
PFKAKTF FOX said:
I dont agree, Nissa has struggled on a number of occasions at left back and TBH the only reason we havent been punished is because of the excellent partnership now being forged by the 2 Patrick's. Tinkering with one player IMO would not hinder but help improve what has become a weak link. We have to stop this square pegs in round holes scenario.

We will have to agree to differ but this back 4 have conceeded one goal in 4 matches where as the ones before kept 1 cleansheet in 7.I see no advantage in changing it.Yes Johannsson might not be ideal but that back 4 seems to work well as a unit if you start sticking Sheehan/Gilbert in then you might find the unit not working so well.Sheehan as time on his side,he'll get his chance.
 
Last edited:


I think we should keep the same back four.
Joey defensive, hughes attacking. Sylla is playing because in the matches i have seen he has been an attacking threat. Hume and De Vries up front
 
Douglas

Maybury
McCarthy
Gerrbrand
Sheehan

Hammond
Hughes
Joey
Smith

Hume
De Vries

Can't believe CL persists with Kisnorbo, i Just don't see what he does for the team. Get Sheehan in, nothing against Nissa, but in our current plight the only way you win games is to score!! Clean sheets are fine but whats the point if you haven't got a hope in hells chance of scoring yourself!!

A bit of fire from the boys in blue on tuesday please for us goal starved fans!!!!
 
flashyfox said:
Get Sheehan in, nothing against Nissa, but in our current plight the only way you win games is to score!! Clean sheets are fine but whats the point if you haven't got a hope in hells chance of scoring yourself!!

So why would playing Sheehan mean we have more chance of scoring ? Johannsson as already scored one this Season from defence.I really don't get this sudden scramble for Sheehan,I've nothing against the guy but eveybody is demanding he starts on Tuesday I just don't get it....must be me.:102:
 
7/4 for Watford I'm afraid...:icon_cry:
 
it's just that when Sheehan has played, he's looked good going forward. Got a decent free kick on him as well, much better than the usual rubbish we serve up. Im not against Nissa defensively, its just that we need to increase our options attacking wise. Hence picking Sheehan ahead of Nissa.
 
flashyfox said:
it's just that when Sheehan has played, he's looked good going forward. Got a decent free kick on him as well, much better than the usual rubbish we serve up. Im not against Nissa defensively, its just that we need to increase our options attacking wise. Hence picking Sheehan ahead of Nissa.

But would they not be better enhanced by not playing Hammond who can't score for shite and Dublin who is past it?Surely in order to improve our chances of scoring we need to look at our Attacking options not only Striker wise but atttacking midfielder wise.We have a solid base in Defence who aren't conceeding i.e doing their job,would it not be nonsensical to risk that because the Left Back is not getting forward enough ? In the long term maybe but I think we have bigger problems than that else where.
 
flashyfox said:
Douglas

Maybury
McCarthy
Gerrbrand
Sheehan

Hammond
Hughes
Joey
Smith

Hume
De Vries

Can't believe CL persists with Kisnorbo, i Just don't see what he does for the team. Get Sheehan in, nothing against Nissa, but in our current plight the only way you win games is to score!! Clean sheets are fine but whats the point if you haven't got a hope in hells chance of scoring yourself!!

A bit of fire from the boys in blue on tuesday please for us goal starved fans!!!!

Reckon I agree with this line up and the comments on kisnobend. Dont see anything I like in him IANGWOCTM. However probably give hammill a go on the left and play smith right. Is hammill fit?
 
fcukcov said:
Reckon I agree with this line up and the comments on kisnobend. Dont see anything I like in him IANGWOCTM. However probably give hammill a go on the left and play smith right. Is hammill fit?

Was he not Sub yesterday ?
 
highland fox said:
Was he not Sub yesterday ?
I was helping a mate move yesterday so I didnt get to follow the game other than about five minutes, so dont really know what went on yesterday.
 
fcukcov said:
I was helping a mate move yesterday so I didnt get to follow the game other than about five minutes, so dont really know what went on yesterday.

You and a few others. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2047
2Arsenal2143
3Nottm F2141
4Newcastle2138
5Chelsea2137
6Manchester C  2135
7Aston Villa2135
8Bournemouth2134
9Fulham2130
10Brighton2129
11Brentford2128
12West Ham2126
13Tottenham 2124
14Palace2124
15Manchester U2124
16Everton2017
17Ipswich2117
18Wolves2116
19Leicester2114
20Southampton217
Back
Top