Not entirely sure how we are supposed to keep certain players happy if they aren't given a game when their colleagues are playing like complete shit.How effective a statement is it should we (when we) get dicked and the players are back in the following game? Arguably, it backfires as a statement. A player could actually see it is validation.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be subject to something, but dropping them for a game, just to attempt to make a point, seems only to be cutting off the nose to spite the face. Drop them if they're shit and you've better options, by all means - but that's arguably not the case here.
Not entirely sure how we are supposed to keep certain players happy if they aren't given a game when their colleagues are playing like complete shit.
They were all garbage, he's dropped the ones that were shit and showed a bad attitude.
Let's remember we don't see these supposed better players behind the scenes.
It's my birthday today. Are Leicester going to give me a nice present?
It's my birthday today. Are Leicester going to give me a nice present?
P | Pld | Pts | |