spionfox
Well-Known Member
I'm almost certain that we could match what Birmingham paid for him and offered him in wages. He's a squad player for them, nothing more.
He'd be a squad player for us too. We are aiming higher than Curtis now.
I'm almost certain that we could match what Birmingham paid for him and offered him in wages. He's a squad player for them, nothing more.
It's not going to be that easy for us to sign established players from the domestic leagues.
All the financial advantages are with the Premier League clubs and those receiving parachute payments.
As for players with previous behavioural issues - if they start scoring goal for your club then in ceases to be a problem.
As for players with previous behavioural issues - if they start scoring goal for your club then in ceases to be a problem.
All the financial advantages are with the Premier League clubs and those receiving parachute payments.
Parachute payments are designed to and don't normally go further than ensuring that the existing players' contracts can be paid. Any club that spends it on the recruitment of new players on higher-than-Championship salaries is courting fiscal disaster should it not be immediately promoted back to the Premier League.
Not if it's Marlon king it doesn't.
apparently having a medical at Birmingham on Friday.
Maybe the Medical will include a pre-frontal lobotomy!
Brum have made a couple of shrewd signings in King and Burke IMO.
Like the owners ever care what the fans think.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 21 | 41 |
4 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
5 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
6 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
7 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
8 | Manchester C | 21 | 35 |
9 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
10 | Brighton | 21 | 31 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 21 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 21 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 20 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 21 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 21 | 6 |