Of course you have to be sure that those you offer a long term deal on a good salary are saleable if it all goes t*ts and you get relegated.
It's far more sensible to reduce the wages in the event of relegation, and have that written into the contract.
We thought players like Izzet, Elliott etc were saleable when we were relegated before, and it turned out they weren't because clubs that wanted them couldn't afford their wages.
It's far more sensible to reduce the wages in the event of relegation, and have that written into the contract.
Agreed.
And we'd be absolutely mad not to be writing them in.
Along with the players agents all being absolutely mad if they don't insert clauses in these contracts stipulating that on relegation they can be sold for a knock-down fee due to their reduced wages.
Whatever way it goes, the players win.
as per Drinky ie no prolonged negotiations, clear he loves the place
as per Drinky ie no prolonged negotiations, clear he loves the place
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |