Milan Speaks Exclusive

[fcukcov]

....And I may be mistaken here, but listening to the way he speaks makes me suspect that he might be a little bit foreign as well

I have heard from a source that this is why the scousers turned down the dubai bid.

 

[Brown Nose]

"Serbian businessman Milan Mandaric has spoken out to calm the nerves of Leicester City supporters, following all the twists and turns of his proposed takeover.

Speaking from Belgrave, Mr Mandaric says he remains committed to taking control of the football club".



He's back in Leicester then.

 

[Melton Fox]

I have heard from a source that this is why the scousers turned down the dubai bid.

Nope, the Liver bird Trust were fed up with waiting for the offical bid document

 

[homer]

"Serbian businessman Milan Mandaric has spoken out to calm the nerves of Leicester City supporters, following all the twists and turns of his proposed takeover.

Speaking from Belgrave, Mr Mandaric says he remains committed to taking control of the football club".



He's back in Leicester then.

Belgrave gate

 

[Babylon]

Speaking from Belgrave, Mr Mandaric says he remains committed to taking control of the football club".

He's back in Leicester then.

Fecking idiots.

 

[Dunc]

I found nothing in that interview to suggest that he would be bad for the club, I'd love to know if anybody else did

Phew, I bet AT, JJ and GC feel mighty stupid now they've heard that soundbite.

:icon_roll

 

[Melton Fox]

Phew, I bet AT, JJ and GC feel mighty stupid now they've heard that soundbite.

:icon_roll

I doubt it

 

[newtonfox]

I love what this guy says.

Get him in quick

:icon_lol:

 

[newtonfox]

his plane is waiting for him in the am to get back here for the match

 

[Biff]

the fact that he says he wants to get this club back to where it belongs is good enough for me.i like a positive attitude unlike some of the losers that post on this forum. if your against the mm bid you can feck off and die as far as im concerned.

 

[Granite Fox]

the fact that he says he wants to get this club back to where it belongs is good enough for me.i like a positive attitude unlike some of the losers that post on this forum. if your against the mm bid you can feck off and die as far as im concerned.

Is anyone actually against it?

OK, maybe RS, but most others have just said it may not turn out as positively as most would hope - I read that as just a note of caution (and sensible too).

There has to be change - and MM appears to be the only hope of that.

 

[Micky]

I'm for big tits!

 

[SJN-Fox]

I'm for big tits!

Perhaps you should form a consortium with Alex

 

[Steven]

the fact that he says he wants to get this club back to where it belongs is good enough for me.i like a positive attitude unlike some of the losers that post on this forum. if your against the mm bid you can feck off and die as far as im concerned.

 

[SilverFox]

What more do we need to hear from this guy.

GET HIM IN NOW!!! Why oh why should it take this long FFS.

 

[Macky]

the fact that he says he wants to get this club back to where it belongs is good enough for me.i like a positive attitude unlike some of the losers that post on this forum. if your against the mm bid you can feck off and die as far as im concerned.

Can you name for me one person that is against the takeover?
Because, I may be wrong but, I haven't seen any posts from anybody that is against it.

 

[Melton Fox]

Can you name for me one person that is against the takeover?
Because, I may be wrong but, I haven't seen any posts from anybody that is against it.

Set up a poll.

a) Against
b) In favour
c) Need more information.

Generally those in favour will say so and vote In Favour, those against will vote either Against, or most likely vote "Need More Information" to hide behind yet more words.

The said people will follow this post of mine by saying "We can't make an informed decision until we know what's in the final bid document, so I won't vote even if you do set a poll up"

If you set up a poll with just "For" and "Against" those against the takeover won't vote, they'll just acuse those that do vote "In Favour" of not thinking about things and being swayed by the likes of Bill Anderson.

So, my suggestion is set up a poll in another thread, those who vote "In Favour" are just that, any other voting will generally mean they are against the takeover.

Again, expect a few more posts below this one explaining that such poll is unvoteable because we haven't yet got all the facts

 

[Biff]

Set up a poll.

a) Against
b) In favour
c) Need more information.

Generally those in favour will say so and vote In Favour, those against will vote either Against, or most likely vote "Need More Information" to hide behind yet more words.

The said people will follow this post of mine by saying "We can't make an informed decision until we know what's in the final bid document, so I won't vote even if you do set a poll up"

If you set up a poll with just "For" and "Against" those against the takeover won't vote, they'll just acuse those that do vote "In Favour" of not thinking about things and being swayed by the likes of Bill Anderson.

So, my suggestion is set up a poll in another thread, those who vote "In Favour" are just that, any other voting will generally mean they are against the takeover.

Again, expect a few more posts below this one explaining that such poll is unvoteable because we haven't yet got all the facts

agree. what i should have said is not only against the takeover but those who are questioning it.
thanks melt for that note .i apologise to any offended posters.:icon_wink

 

[Macky]

Set up a poll.

a) Against
b) In favour
c) Need more information.

Generally those in favour will say so and vote In Favour, those against will vote either Against, or most likely vote "Need More Information" to hide behind yet more words.

The said people will follow this post of mine by saying "We can't make an informed decision until we know what's in the final bid document, so I won't vote even if you do set a poll up"

If you set up a poll with just "For" and "Against" those against the takeover won't vote, they'll just acuse those that do vote "In Favour" of not thinking about things and being swayed by the likes of Bill Anderson.

So, my suggestion is set up a poll in another thread, those who vote "In Favour" are just that, any other voting will generally mean they are against the takeover.

Again, expect a few more posts below this one explaining that such poll is unvoteable because we haven't yet got all the facts

You need to include a few extra options in the poll.
In favour of investment but would welcome guarutees of the clubs future, for one

 

[Macky]

agree. what i should have said is not only against the takeover but those who are questioning it.
thanks melt for that note .i apologise to any offended posters.:icon_wink

I'm sorry but that is just feckin insane in my opinion.
So anybody who asks questions should f uck off & die????