Mr Rudkin, Mr Robinson and the Godfather Movies

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

David Gwilliam

Well-Known Member
This has been a summer of fanciful speculation. People have seen the change of manager as coming from the Thai sex tapes. There is absolutely no evidence for this. My speculation is better - there is very little evidence.

Some months ago Terry Robinson was replaced as Director of Football by Jon Rudkin. Looking back people concentrated on why Mr Robinson was sacked rather than why Mr Rudkin was appointed. It was claimed that Mr Robinson's signings were poor despite the performances of Cambiasso, Ulloa and to a lesser extent Simpson.

Like every one else I missed the key point. There were no other candidates interviewed. It was as though Mr Robinson was sacked in order that Mr Rudkin be appointed. It had all the ruthlessness of Michael Corleone in the Godfather movies. The phrase used about Mr Rudkin was that he had "an excellent understanding of the club’s footballing philosophy and values."

Nigel could have kept quiet but made a point of saying that the loss of Terry Robinson was "disappointing on a personal and business level." Terry Robinson was always described as "bluff" and I would guess that like Nigel believed in the traditional way of running a club." When Nigel was sacked it was said that relations had broken down and that there "were differences in perspective". This suggests that unlike Mr Rudkin he did not have "an excellent understanding of the clubs footballing philosophy and values."

My guess is that the club will now be run on a more collegial basis. Mr Shakespeare and Mr Walsh seem to be staying on. Kante seems to have originally been a Steve Walsh target.

People have argued about whether Mr Rudkin has done a good job in developing young talent. This seems to me to be irrelevant to the job of Director of Football. He will have seen at close quarters the success of O'Neill, the abject failure of Peter Taylor, the worse failure of Paulo Sousa, the sheer nastiness of Martin Allen the eccentricity of Ian Holloway and the successes of Nigel Pearson. He has been at the club through administration, relegation and promotion. He will know how a football club works.

Of course the new "footballing philosophy and values" need to be turned into football results. . Meanwhile Mr Ranieri and Mr Rudkin deserve the chance to prove themselves.
 
I'm waiting on David's epic thread relating the summer events of Leicester City football club to Thomas Pynchon's Classic novel Gravity's Rainbow.

Including allusions as to how James Pearson orgasms every time he hears a bomb go off and how Claudio Ranieri attempts to deep-sea dive into a toilet. And don't forget all the scatological scenes. The absolutely copious amounts of poo.

I feel it's a pretty decent metaphor for our summer break.
 
This post doesn't really make any sense.

I am sorry you found the post difficult BN.

The allusion to Michael Corleone refers to a character in a book and series of movies about the mafia in the 1970s.
The "fanciful speculation" you quote was about the reason for Pearson's sacking where the club has said very little.
The "chance to prove themselves" was about giving the new regime time to get things right.
The main aim of the post was to suggest that from now on the Thais may intend running the club more on a continental model rather than on the traditional English model.

I hope this explanation helps.
 
I am sorry you found the post difficult BN...I hope this explanation helps.

No, it doesn't. I am quite capable of understanding references and allusions and I quite like them when used appropriately and with some intelligence. I'm afraid to say that your attempt at this style isn't quite Pilgrim's Progress.

It is fair to comment that your original post made no sense on a factual, speculative or allegorical level. Originally, I did begin to take it apart and demonstrate this but it was simply too big a task so I summed my thoughts up succinctly instead.

Perhaps you could try that too sometime.
 
No, it doesn't. I am quite capable of understanding references and allusions and I quite like them when used appropriately and with some intelligence. I'm afraid to say that your attempt at this style isn't quite Pilgrim's Progress.

It is fair to comment that your original post made no sense on a factual, speculative or allegorical level. Originally, I did begin to take it apart and demonstrate this but it was simply too big a task so I summed my thoughts up succinctly instead.

Perhaps you could try that too sometime.

Oh dear!

My attempt to be helpful only ended up being annoying. It was ever so. I misunderstood your comment that "the post doesn't really make sense" as meaning that you found the post didn't make sense. I should have realised that what you meant was that you disagreed with it.

Presumably you feel the club will be run in much the same way but with different people running it. I am sorry you found giving reasons for this "too big a task"..

Posters have failed on a factual level before and they have failed on a speculative level. Mine is perhaps the first post to fail on an allegorical level as well. This is a new low even for me. You are right that I am indeed a long way from Pilgrims Progress.

You wanted a succinct comment - I can do no better than repeat again "Oh dear!"
 
Such a peculiar rap battle

There is no battle
I tried to be helpful to BN which I am sure he appreciates.
He suggests that I can best understand Leicester City through the writings of a 17th century Puritan convict. Remembering the high regard we all had for BNs posts last season I am grateful for the advice.
Far from "a battle" I have unconditional regard for BN as I am sure he has for me.
 
Sorry DG, but I'm with Swede on this one. Might get some popcorn and just stay in here.
 
There is no battle
I tried to be helpful to BN which I am sure he appreciates.
He suggests that I can best understand Leicester City through the writings of a 17th century Puritan convict. Remembering the high regard we all had for BNs posts last season I am grateful for the advice.
Far from "a battle" I have unconditional regard for BN as I am sure he has for me.
*drops mic*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top